1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80252-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual case of condylar dislocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The related mandibular fracture obviously promoted the rotation and movement of the ramus, which would facilitate the superior or lateral dislocation of the condyle as observed in the current case and previously reported cases2,6-9,11,13,17. As described by other authors, however, intact mandibular condyle dislocations may also occur occasionally without traumatic fractures5,12,14,16.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The related mandibular fracture obviously promoted the rotation and movement of the ramus, which would facilitate the superior or lateral dislocation of the condyle as observed in the current case and previously reported cases2,6-9,11,13,17. As described by other authors, however, intact mandibular condyle dislocations may also occur occasionally without traumatic fractures5,12,14,16.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The goal of the treatment for SDMC is to reposition the condyle into its original physiological position and closed reduction is first choice of treatment as it is the simplest, least traumatic and safest if managed early. 9,15,16 Maximal inter incisal mouth opening of 30 mm and good occlusal relationship 5 months post operatively is regarded as good sign of successful treatment of condylar dislocation. 16 SDMC in all of our cases were corrected by closed or manual reduction under general anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest 6 cases were type I dislocated. The Worthington described his type of case with the term unusual and the information was not available for the case of Radhakrishkna (Table III) (Table IV) [1][2][3][4]7,10,12,13,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] while 34 dislocations (46.26%) was managed by surgical modalities [5][6][7]9,11,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]24,26,27,29] while no treatment was given for 2 cases (2.98%) resulting in fibrosseous ankylosis [4] (Table V). It can be concluded that most of all surgeons had used open reduction techniques for management of supero-lateral dislocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%