2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0303-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unusual Case of Stent Migration After Celiac Trunk Endovascular Revascularization

Abstract: A 61-year-old woman underwent celiac trunk stenting to treat abdominal angina. Three months later, she was readmitted for recurrent symptoms. Computed tomography control revealed the migration of the stent into the splenic artery. No sign of vessel injury or end-organ ischemia was detected. Repeat stenting of the celiac trunk was performed; the postoperative course was uneventful. 12 months later, the patient was asymptomatic with the second stent in its correct position, and she was asymptomatic for mesenteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other related complications include endoleaks, stent-graft occlusion, stent-graft migration, and aneurysms. Silvia reported a patient who underwent abdominal stent implantation due to abdominal angina and found that the stent migrated to the splenic artery three months later [17]. We did not choose balloon dilation or stent implantation because the patient's liver had su cient blood supply, and the occluded CA was bene cial to the patient's injury at that time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other related complications include endoleaks, stent-graft occlusion, stent-graft migration, and aneurysms. Silvia reported a patient who underwent abdominal stent implantation due to abdominal angina and found that the stent migrated to the splenic artery three months later [17]. We did not choose balloon dilation or stent implantation because the patient's liver had su cient blood supply, and the occluded CA was bene cial to the patient's injury at that time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%