1968
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1968.02100010627018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unusual Chromosome Abnormality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1969
1969
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 chromosome translocated to a different D chromosome in each case. The one case of 2/14 (Reisman and Kasahara, 1968) belonged clinically to the 'unbalanced' chromosome group, in contrast to the present patient who was considered on clinical and chromosomal grounds to have a balanced translocation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…2 chromosome translocated to a different D chromosome in each case. The one case of 2/14 (Reisman and Kasahara, 1968) belonged clinically to the 'unbalanced' chromosome group, in contrast to the present patient who was considered on clinical and chromosomal grounds to have a balanced translocation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…If similarity of congenital defects and presence of a 2:D translocation in most reported cases is not coincidental then material lost from chromosome No. 2 should be considered more important than that lost from the D chromosome, since the abnormal D chromosomes involved in the cases of Reisman and Kasahara (1968), Wurster et al (1969), and this report are different. Translocation of a part of the long arm of chromosome No.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…13 is involved. The abnormal chromosome described by Reisman and Kasahara (1968) was identified as a No. 14, and that of Wurster et al (1969) as a No.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and a D group chromosome have been reported (Lisco and Lisco, 1967;Wurster et al, 1969;Davidson et al, 1970). In the reports of Reisman and Kasahara (1968) and Genest et al (1971) congenital anomalies were associated with the chromosome rearrangements in a way which suggests that the latter were unbalanced. Ricci et al (1968) described a malformed child with partial monosomy D and partial trisomy 2, whose 52 I II III FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%