2002
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-20-29-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual geometry of the ionospheric signature of the cusp: implications for magnetopause merging sites

Abstract: Abstract. The HF radar Doppler spectral width boundary (SWB) in the cusp represents a very good proxy for the equatorward edge of cusp ion precipitation in the dayside ionosphere. For intervals where the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) has a southward component (B z < 0), the SWB is typically displaced poleward of the actual location of the open-closed field line boundary (or polar cap boundary, PCB). This is due to the poleward motion of newlyreconnected magnetic field lines during the cusp ion travel tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, one must be careful when interpreting spatial and temporal variations of the proxies in the cusp region. These can be due to variations in the offset of the proxy from the PCB, as well as to variations in the PCB itself (Chisham et al, 2002). It is also unclear what effect the transient nature of reconnection will have on the variation of this proxy offset and on the location of the observable cusp (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one must be careful when interpreting spatial and temporal variations of the proxies in the cusp region. These can be due to variations in the offset of the proxy from the PCB, as well as to variations in the PCB itself (Chisham et al, 2002). It is also unclear what effect the transient nature of reconnection will have on the variation of this proxy offset and on the location of the observable cusp (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poleward edge of this ion dispersion represents a good proxy for the ionospheric projection of the merging line, as it marks the arrival in the ionosphere of the first magnetosheath-like ions from the reconnection site following an interval of reconnection. However, there exists a small (typically <0.5 • ) latitudinal offset of this proxy from the "true" projection of the merging line, as the footprint will have convected sunward during the finite travel time of the fastest ions from the reconnection site to the ionosphere (Rodger, 2000;Chisham et al, 2002b). We assume that this offset is negligible when compared to other uncertainties in our determination of the location and motion of the merging line and discuss the effect of these uncertainties later in the paper.…”
Section: Location Of the Ionospheric Projection Of The Merging Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include optical measurements from all-sky cameras, imaging spacecraft and meridian-scanning photometers (Blanchard et al, 1995(Blanchard et al, , 1997Sandholt et al, 1998;Brittnacher et al, 1999), particle precipitation signatures from low-altitude spacecraft (Newell et al, 1991(Newell et al, , 1996Sotirelis and Newell, 2000) and measurements from incoherent and coherent scatter radars (Baker et al, 1995;Blanchard et al, 1996Blanchard et al, , 2001Milan et al, 1999;Chisham et al, 2001Chisham et al, , 2002Lester et al, 2001;Chisham and Freeman, 2003), or a combination of all of these . Unfortunately, most of these measurements suffer from only partial coverage of the auroral oval at any one time, making a global determination of the OCB difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%