2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual transient following the short GRB 071227

Abstract: We present X-ray and optical observations of the short duration gamma-ray burst GRB 071227 and its host at z = 0.381, obtained using Swift, Gemini South and the Very Large Telescope. We identify a short-lived and moderately bright optical transient, with flux significantly in excess of that expected from a simple extrapolation of the Xray spectrum at 0.2-0.3 days after burst. We fit the SED with afterglow models allowing for high extinction and thermal emission models that approximate a kilonova to assess the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 125 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, even the color information may be insufficient for an unambiguous identification. A counterpart with unusually red colors was found for the short GRB 070724A (𝑖-𝐾 𝑠 ≈4; Berger et al 2009) and GRB 071227 (𝑟-𝑧≈1.5; Eyles et al 2019) and, in both cases, attributed to dust effects at the GRB site. The rapid timescales and high luminosity (≈ 10 43 erg s −1 ) of these two sources did not match the predictions of a radioactive-powered kilonova, although they could fit within the expected range for a magnetar-powered kilonova (Yu et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nonetheless, even the color information may be insufficient for an unambiguous identification. A counterpart with unusually red colors was found for the short GRB 070724A (𝑖-𝐾 𝑠 ≈4; Berger et al 2009) and GRB 071227 (𝑟-𝑧≈1.5; Eyles et al 2019) and, in both cases, attributed to dust effects at the GRB site. The rapid timescales and high luminosity (≈ 10 43 erg s −1 ) of these two sources did not match the predictions of a radioactive-powered kilonova, although they could fit within the expected range for a magnetar-powered kilonova (Yu et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%