1991
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199101000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Update of Mortality due to Brain Neoplasms and Other Causes among Employees of a Petrochemical Facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excess was greater in nonwhites. These results were not sufficient to identify a specific chemical cause (Teta et al, 1991).…”
Section: Teta Et A/ (1991) Updated This Study Adding Six Years To Tmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The excess was greater in nonwhites. These results were not sufficient to identify a specific chemical cause (Teta et al, 1991).…”
Section: Teta Et A/ (1991) Updated This Study Adding Six Years To Tmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Several studies have attempted to link chemical exposure to brain tumors Teta et al, 1991;Delzell et a/., 1989). Olin and Ahlbom (1980) reported increased malignant gliomas among Swedish chemical engineers.…”
Section: Chemical Industry Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation period, but not the work history data, has been extended for both cohorts through 1983 with the use of company records and the National Death Index (12). Vital status was ascertained through 1983 for 99% of the subjects from each location (tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the NIOSH studies of Waxweiler and colleagues also reported more observed than expected deaths for both CNS cancers (O/E=13/7.2) and benign brain tumors (O/E= 6/2.4) among 7,595 hourly male workers [3,4]. When CNS cancers and benign brain tumors were combined, the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was statistically significant (SMR [10]. The study found no increased mortality among maintenance workers or laborers, in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%