2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-020-03875-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated comparison of the $M_{\bullet}$ vs $M_{G}\sigma ^{2}$ relation with $M_{\bullet}$ vs $\sigma$ and the problem of the masses of galaxies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be precise, both the response and the covariate are on a logarithmic scale. The results are based on R routines and codes, whereas in Iannella and Feoli (2020) the OLS fit was obtained from Mathematica and other fits were obtained from the LINMIX ERR (Kelly 2007) and MP-FITEXY (Tremaine et al 2002) routines. The latter techniques have not been considered here, but prediction accuracy could have been evaluated by leave-oneout cross-validation as well.…”
Section: Fitted Scaling Relations: Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To be precise, both the response and the covariate are on a logarithmic scale. The results are based on R routines and codes, whereas in Iannella and Feoli (2020) the OLS fit was obtained from Mathematica and other fits were obtained from the LINMIX ERR (Kelly 2007) and MP-FITEXY (Tremaine et al 2002) routines. The latter techniques have not been considered here, but prediction accuracy could have been evaluated by leave-oneout cross-validation as well.…”
Section: Fitted Scaling Relations: Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses concern the five samples from Iannella and Feoli (2020) and one more sample collected in Kormendy and Ho (2013). The results regarding the first five samples are expected to improve over the findings from Feoli and Mele (2005) and Iannella and Feoli (2020).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations