2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01054-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) for Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature concerning Pakistan there are good number of studies on seismic hazard analysis. Among these, Rahman et al (2021) is the most recent. Rahman et al (2021) is based on hybrid approach consisting of spatial smoothen approach and the classical approach and it predicts high hazard value PGA in range of 0.0-0.70g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature concerning Pakistan there are good number of studies on seismic hazard analysis. Among these, Rahman et al (2021) is the most recent. Rahman et al (2021) is based on hybrid approach consisting of spatial smoothen approach and the classical approach and it predicts high hazard value PGA in range of 0.0-0.70g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)Sesetyan et al (2018) (2)Rahman et al (2021) (3) BCP (2007) and (4)Pakistan Meteorological Department and Norwegian Seismic Arrary, 2007 (PMD andNORSAR, 2007).Sesetyan et al (2018) reports PGA values for 475 and 2475 years return periods. Rahman et al (2021) produced peak ground parameters for 475 and 2475 years return periods for PGA and SA's at 0.1 and 0.2 seconds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ug is obtained directly from the PEER ground motion database and matched to the MCE (Maximum Considered Earthquake) level at Islamabad, validated by the match response spectrum of 3 GMs shown in Figure 3. Three free field ground motions are selected from the PEER ground motion database using input parameters for Islamabad as recommended by Zaman et al [34]. The input parameters included Earthquake magnitude from 6.3-7.8, source to site distance (Rrup) between 10 to 50 km, fault type categorized as either Strike-slip or reverse, and shear wave velocity (VS30)…”
Section: Ground Motion Selection and Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ground motions are selected from PEER database. The input parameter for the selection of the ground motion is specified in [85]. The parameters for the selection of ground motion are magnitude (6.3-7.8), Rrup values 10-50 km, fault type (strip slip and reverse), and Vs30 (480-620).…”
Section: Selection Of Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%