2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01683.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated ranking of academic journals in economics

Abstract: We conduct an update of the ranking of economic journals by Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, and Stengos (2003). However, our present study differs methodologically from that earlier study in an important dimension. We use a rolling window of years between 2003 and 2008, for each year counting the number of citations of articles published in the previous 10 years. This allows us to obtain a smoother longer view of the evolution of rankings in the period under consideration and avoid the inherent randomness that may ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the 1989 RS E and the 1992 RAE up to two publications from each full-time member of the faculty were RAE and subsequent exercises (Harley and Lee, 1997;Lee and Harley, 1998;and Lee, 2007). It is not difficult to discern why Diamond's list of 27 journals obtained such an elevated status among UK economists: those journals appeared repeatedly as top quality journals in journal ranking studies and in articles that used 'professional judgment' journals to identify the top, blue ribbon, or 'everyone would agree are core, mainstream, highly respected, quality' journals prior to 1989 and since 1989 up to the present day (Lee, 2006;Schneider and Ursprung, 2008;Ritzberger, 2008;Da Silva 2009;Halkos and Nickolaos, 2011;Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, and Stengos, 2011); and they appeared to be sanctioned by Economics and Social Research Council, the RES, and CHUDE since they represent ed 16 of the 22 high impact journals identified in their jointly sponsored study, International…”
Section: Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the 1989 RS E and the 1992 RAE up to two publications from each full-time member of the faculty were RAE and subsequent exercises (Harley and Lee, 1997;Lee and Harley, 1998;and Lee, 2007). It is not difficult to discern why Diamond's list of 27 journals obtained such an elevated status among UK economists: those journals appeared repeatedly as top quality journals in journal ranking studies and in articles that used 'professional judgment' journals to identify the top, blue ribbon, or 'everyone would agree are core, mainstream, highly respected, quality' journals prior to 1989 and since 1989 up to the present day (Lee, 2006;Schneider and Ursprung, 2008;Ritzberger, 2008;Da Silva 2009;Halkos and Nickolaos, 2011;Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, and Stengos, 2011); and they appeared to be sanctioned by Economics and Social Research Council, the RES, and CHUDE since they represent ed 16 of the 22 high impact journals identified in their jointly sponsored study, International…”
Section: Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, studies in our meta-analysis published in top-ranking journal [i.e. top 25% of Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, and Stengos (2011) ranking] consistently qualify as top-ranking in other journal rankings such as Wohlrabe (2016) as well. For robustness, we run regressions with an alternate ranking of journal quality.…”
Section: A Appendix Tablementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, we control for publication outlet by including a dummy for high-ranked journals. Studies such as Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, andStengos (2011), Chang, Maasoumi, andMcAleer (2016), and Wohlrabe (2016) provide ranking of journal quality. These studies provide rankings of economics journals based on journal influence and impact factor among others.…”
Section: Publication Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature provides a number of ratings of the academic economics institutions based on different ranking criteria (Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, & Stengos, 2011;Kalaitzidakis, Stengos, & Mamuneas, 2003). We opted for the ranking of the Repec repository, 37 which is based on aggregation of seven ranking methods 38 used to rate economics institutions whose working papers make up their working-paper database.…”
Section: Choice Of Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%