2017
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Updated Scheme for Categorizing Foods Implicated in Foodborne Disease Outbreaks: A Tri-Agency Collaboration

Abstract: Updates to the food categorization scheme and new methods for assigning implicated foods to specific food categories can help increase the number of outbreaks attributed to a single food category. The increased specificity of food categories in this scheme may help improve source attribution analyses, eventually leading to improved foodborne illness source attribution estimates and enhanced food safety and regulatory efforts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in child welfare, methods for assessing specific risk factors like poverty, drug use, single parent status, and language barriers have been elaborated over time to enable the production of customized risk profiles for each individual or family (Parton, ). Similarly, in the case of food safety, developments in foodborne illness surveillance, outbreak detection, and institutional coordination have led to higher resolution in source attribution, that is, in assigning foodborne illness risks to specific food categories (Richardson et al, ). The confluence of large‐scale data analysis with risk‐management produces greater sensitivity to fine gradations in harms observed, which in turn drives adoption of more sensitive mechanisms to identify risk factors in the domain of control.…”
Section: An Alternative: the Problem Definition And Control Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in child welfare, methods for assessing specific risk factors like poverty, drug use, single parent status, and language barriers have been elaborated over time to enable the production of customized risk profiles for each individual or family (Parton, ). Similarly, in the case of food safety, developments in foodborne illness surveillance, outbreak detection, and institutional coordination have led to higher resolution in source attribution, that is, in assigning foodborne illness risks to specific food categories (Richardson et al, ). The confluence of large‐scale data analysis with risk‐management produces greater sensitivity to fine gradations in harms observed, which in turn drives adoption of more sensitive mechanisms to identify risk factors in the domain of control.…”
Section: An Alternative: the Problem Definition And Control Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To classify isolation sources, we adapted the Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration 119 (IFSAC) scheme [13] which has the advantages of being simple enough that a basic 120 knowledge of the isolation source is in general enough to classify a sample. Moreover, this 121 classification was developed by a consensus of three major US agencies (Centers for Disease 122…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of SNPs separating isolate genomes are used to assess the genetic relatedness 152 among isolates [13]. If a small SNP distance is observed, the isolates can be considered as 153 closely related and the likelihood that they arise from a common source is high.…”
Section: Snp Clusters Snp Threshold 151mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consumption of contaminated fresh produce continues to be a significant cause of foodborne illness in the United States (US) (Richardson et al 2017). For example, in there were 383 reported foodborne illnesses associated with leafy green vegetables, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%