2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An upper bound on the number of perfect quadratic forms

Abstract: In a recent preprint on arXiv Roland Bacher showed that the number p d of non-similar perfect d-dimensional quadratic forms satisfies e Ω(d) < p d < e O(d 3 log(d)) . We improve the upper bound to e O(d 2 log(d)) by a volumetric argument based on Voronoi's first reduction theory.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classifying perfect matrices up to arithmetical equivalence had already attracted Lagrange (n = 2), Gauß (n = 3) and others. Based on his theory Voronoi gave an algorithm for the classification for any given dimension n. Still being the only known approach for classification in arbitrary dimension, it has been used by several authors, see [8], [18], [24], [27]. Due to the difficulty of polyhedral representation conversions the classification is nevertheless still open for all n ≥ 9.…”
Section: Perfect Positive Definite Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifying perfect matrices up to arithmetical equivalence had already attracted Lagrange (n = 2), Gauß (n = 3) and others. Based on his theory Voronoi gave an algorithm for the classification for any given dimension n. Still being the only known approach for classification in arbitrary dimension, it has been used by several authors, see [8], [18], [24], [27]. Due to the difficulty of polyhedral representation conversions the classification is nevertheless still open for all n ≥ 9.…”
Section: Perfect Positive Definite Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we follow a similar argument to van Woerden in [6] in order to determine an upper bound on the number of homothety classes of perfect unary forms for an arbitrary totally real number field. Our result is stated as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%