2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An upper ontology based on ISO 15926

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spirit of the Heidelberg workshop and the IEEE SUO Effort, this Summit attempted to get the stewards of the major open upper ontologies to come together and converge on some consensus. A ten-point joint communiqué (Obrst et al, 2006) was released by the representatives of eight upper ontologies well known at that time, namely: the Generalized Upper Model (GUM) by Bateman et al (1995); the ontology of Descriptions and Situations (D&S) by Gangemi and Mika (2003); the Process Specification Language (PSL/ISO 18629) by Gruninger and Menzel (2003); the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE) by Masolo et al (2003); OpenCyc by Lenat and Guha (1989); the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) by Niles and Pease (2001); the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) by Arp et al (2015); the upper ontology based on ISO 15926 by Batres et al (2007).…”
Section: Year 2006: the Start Of The Ontology Summitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spirit of the Heidelberg workshop and the IEEE SUO Effort, this Summit attempted to get the stewards of the major open upper ontologies to come together and converge on some consensus. A ten-point joint communiqué (Obrst et al, 2006) was released by the representatives of eight upper ontologies well known at that time, namely: the Generalized Upper Model (GUM) by Bateman et al (1995); the ontology of Descriptions and Situations (D&S) by Gangemi and Mika (2003); the Process Specification Language (PSL/ISO 18629) by Gruninger and Menzel (2003); the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE) by Masolo et al (2003); OpenCyc by Lenat and Guha (1989); the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) by Niles and Pease (2001); the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) by Arp et al (2015); the upper ontology based on ISO 15926 by Batres et al (2007).…”
Section: Year 2006: the Start Of The Ontology Summitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the project, a basic condition monitoring ontology for wheel impact faults was created, which could reason about the severity of reported faults and classify a vehicle status accordingly. The ISO 15926 standard (Batres et al, 2007) was initially developed for the integration and exchange of information relating to process plants including oil and gas production facilities. ISO 15926 takes a very "ground-up" approach to the modelling of processes, allowing each piece of equipment to be described in terms of its component parts as well as its temporal existence.…”
Section: Existing Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was designed to support the evolution of data through time [20]. It belongs to the category of the so-called upper ontologies, which define basic classes and relations from which domain-specific classes and relations can be defined.…”
Section: The Iso 15926 Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the ontologies was based on OntoCAPE [18], some safety and operation ontologies [39], and the ISO 15926 ontology [20]. The CBR module implemented a search mechanism based on five types of similarity measures: class similarity, string similarity, numeric similarity, numeric interval similarity and set similarity.…”
Section: Petrohazopmentioning
confidence: 99%