2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-7946(05)80099-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An upper ontology based on ISO 15926

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schema conflict encompasses identifier or naming mismatch, different attributes used to define the same data and other structural inconsistencies occurring from the different schema design. In such cases ontologies are used for resolving the schema conflicts and mapping the different project schemas (Wache et al, 2001, Batres et al 2007). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schema conflict encompasses identifier or naming mismatch, different attributes used to define the same data and other structural inconsistencies occurring from the different schema design. In such cases ontologies are used for resolving the schema conflicts and mapping the different project schemas (Wache et al, 2001, Batres et al 2007). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper ontology was designed to be sufficiently generic for any engineering application, but it was developed as a conceptual data model for the representation of technical information of process plants including oil and gas production facilities. The original ontology was documented in EXPRESS, but it has also been implemented in OWL (Batres, et al, 2007).…”
Section: Integration With the Upper Ontology And Further Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, to our knowledge. A number of recent works (A. Matsokis & D. Kiritsis 2010), (Kim et al 2009), (Fiorentini et al 2008), (Demoly et al 2012), (Panetto et al 2012) and (Batres et al 2007) in various phases of the lifecycle have already provided promising results.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%