2022
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2022.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research

Abstract: The rapid pace at which technology changes creates a challenge for industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists, who often conduct hypothetico-deductive research. In this article, we examine technology research in the I-O psychology community by asking three questions: Why should I-O psychologists study new technologies? How timely is I-O psychologists’ technology research? How can I-O psychologists produce timelier technology research? Using archival data from 23 years of SIOP conferences and a historical ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both impact how employees experience their jobs and behave accordingly and can thus have psychological implications in the present (Makarius et al 2020;Schwabe and Castellacci 2020). This requires research methods that not only examine the status quo or past experiences, but also capture expectations and beliefs about the future (see, e.g., White et al 2022, for timelier technology research in psychology). A common problem with this, however, is their susceptibility to error (e.g., forecasts are often subject to positivity bias; Baumeister et al 2016;Monroe et al 2017).…”
Section: Ai Ai-driven Automation and Challenges Of Empirical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both impact how employees experience their jobs and behave accordingly and can thus have psychological implications in the present (Makarius et al 2020;Schwabe and Castellacci 2020). This requires research methods that not only examine the status quo or past experiences, but also capture expectations and beliefs about the future (see, e.g., White et al 2022, for timelier technology research in psychology). A common problem with this, however, is their susceptibility to error (e.g., forecasts are often subject to positivity bias; Baumeister et al 2016;Monroe et al 2017).…”
Section: Ai Ai-driven Automation and Challenges Of Empirical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journals might also require shortened introductions, but more detailed methods and results sections, to enhance reporting rigor (not only for AI/ML, but for other methods as well). Further, I-O and OBHR journals will need to increase the speed of decisions, as typical AI/ML publishing outlets in computer science provide final decisions in a matter of weeks rather than months for a first revision (see White et al, 2022).…”
Section: New Ways To Publish Ai/ml-related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially relevant in research on technology, as technology as a research subject is constantly and rapidly evolving. As White et al (2022) point out, psychological research on workplace technologies lags an average of six years behind the respective technologies' market launch and is thus often unable to be actively involved in shaping future workplace technologies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%