1962
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(62)90522-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An x-ray and neutron diffraction analysis of lithium hydride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, high reactivity makes it difficult from the experimental point of view and, until lately, the supporting experimental data have been scant compared with the wealth of theoretical results and predictions. For 0108-7673/92/010046-15503.00 example, until 1986, the only neutron and X-ray diffraction results were those obtained by Calder, Cochran, Griffiths & Lowde (1962) in their classical work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, high reactivity makes it difficult from the experimental point of view and, until lately, the supporting experimental data have been scant compared with the wealth of theoretical results and predictions. For 0108-7673/92/010046-15503.00 example, until 1986, the only neutron and X-ray diffraction results were those obtained by Calder, Cochran, Griffiths & Lowde (1962) in their classical work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of error in the scattering factors of hydrogen on the temperature factors derived from the refinement have been discussed by Calder, Cochran, Griffith & Lowde (1962) who compared X-ray and neutron resuits to show that in crystals of LiH the hydrogen ion suffers contraction compared to the free atom. Jensen & Sundaralingam (1964) found evidence for contraction of the bonded hydrogen atom by comparing the isotropic thermal parameters of the hydrogen to Bi~o of the atoms to which they are bonded.…”
Section: Comparandon Of Thermal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their ionic properties are weaker than for alkali halide crystals because the electronic affinity for hydrogen is weaker than for halide ions [I]. Moreover, X-ray and neutron diffraction [2] as well as electron diffraction [3] experiments have shown the existence of a certain part of covalent bonding at least in the case of LiH. Possibly, the presence of covalent bonding is one of the reasons why lithium hydride isotopes exhibit stronger second-order Raman scattering [4] than alkali halides and why the optical band gap of LiH (z 5 eV [5]) is comparable to the ionization energy of a Li atom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%