1999
DOI: 10.1080/09593332008616810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic-Aerobic Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste Leachate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerobic methods are often used as a finishing process for wastes treated anaerobically [59,60]. During aerobic digestion, organic matter is broken down and oxidized into CO 2 in a constantly aerated system [61] (pp.…”
Section: Future Research For Improved Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aerobic methods are often used as a finishing process for wastes treated anaerobically [59,60]. During aerobic digestion, organic matter is broken down and oxidized into CO 2 in a constantly aerated system [61] (pp.…”
Section: Future Research For Improved Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Aerobic digestion can achieve greater organic matter reduction in both industrial and aquaponic/RAS effluent treatment than anaerobic [24,59]. Sludge production from microbial growth and high treatment costs due to constant aeration are often limiting factors for the large-scale application of aerobic digestion [62].…”
Section: Future Research For Improved Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future research would benefit from consistent OC measurements in correspondence with TSS and aqueous nutrient concentration measurements to provide a more accurate HRT for a treatment system. Two-stage anaerobic to aerobic treatment is commonly used for municipal and terrestrial agriculture waste [32,33]. This combined approach has been shown to be more effective at reducing TOC and total solids than the individual use of either method [32,33].…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process sequence the final aerobic stage serves as post-treatment to improve the final effluent quality (Agdag and Sponza, 2005;Hoilijoki et al, 2000). For instance, Borzacconi et al (1999) loaded a UASB at an OLR of 20 kg COD/m³.day at an HRT of 2 days and achieved a COD removal greater than 80%; the subsequent aerobic rotating biological contactor achieved 72% COD removal. Another process advantage is the possibility of removing ammonia from the leachate in the aerobic step, but it is known that high influent COD promotes heterotrophic growth and inhibits ammonium oxidation (Cheng and Chen, 1994;Hanaki et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%