1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1993.tb01457.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic bacterial reductions of aldehydes and ketones: a rapid screening procedure

Abstract: A semi‐quantitative screening procedure is described whereby the abilities of cell‐free extracts of bacteria to oxidize a selection of alcohols are rapidly disclosed. The activities displayed in the preliminary screen generally correlate well with the relative abilities of washed suspensions of these bacteria to reduce the corresponding aldehydes and ketones. The method therefore promises to be helpful in informing the choice of the most appropriate bacterium wherewith to effect the bioreduction of any particu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several aldehydes, including methyl butanal, were observed in the headspace of the blank MHB liquid media and their concentrations decreased in the headspace of bacterial cultures; thus, they are not included in tables 2 and 3. This removal of aldehydes from culture media by bacterial and some mammalian cells has been observed in previous studies [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several aldehydes, including methyl butanal, were observed in the headspace of the blank MHB liquid media and their concentrations decreased in the headspace of bacterial cultures; thus, they are not included in tables 2 and 3. This removal of aldehydes from culture media by bacterial and some mammalian cells has been observed in previous studies [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This removal of aldehydes from culture media by bacterial and some mammalian cells has been observed in previous studies [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: ○ ○supporting
confidence: 82%