2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic biodegradability of Category 2 animal by-products: Methane potential and inoculum source

Abstract: Category 2 animal by-products that need to be sterilized with steam pressure according Regulation (EC) 1774/2002 are studied. In this work, 2 sets of experiments were performed in mesophilic conditions: (i) biomethane potential determination testing 0.5%, 2.0% and 5.0% total solids (TS), using sludge from the anaerobic digester of a wastewater treatment plant as inoculum; (ii) biodegradability tests at a constant TS concentration of 2.0% and different inoculum sources (digested sludge from a wastewater treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though less CH 4 was produced, biogas quality was slightly higher from sludge than from the landfill solid sample (56% and 47% CH 4 , respectively), suggesting that both samples have potential as microbial inocula and are comparable at optimal I:S ratios. Landfill leachate has been used to test agroindustrial waste biodegradability with productivities of 50-314 mL CH 4 g −1 VS. 13,14 Although comparable at the highest value to our results, landfill leachate might possess concentrated amounts of heavy metals that could compromise the use of the digestate as a by-product. The combined inoculum exhibited satisfactory results for all performance criteria evaluated; in particular, gas composition up to 62.3% CH 4 and COD removal efficiency up to 90.5%.…”
Section: Biochemical Methane Potential Assaysupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though less CH 4 was produced, biogas quality was slightly higher from sludge than from the landfill solid sample (56% and 47% CH 4 , respectively), suggesting that both samples have potential as microbial inocula and are comparable at optimal I:S ratios. Landfill leachate has been used to test agroindustrial waste biodegradability with productivities of 50-314 mL CH 4 g −1 VS. 13,14 Although comparable at the highest value to our results, landfill leachate might possess concentrated amounts of heavy metals that could compromise the use of the digestate as a by-product. The combined inoculum exhibited satisfactory results for all performance criteria evaluated; in particular, gas composition up to 62.3% CH 4 and COD removal efficiency up to 90.5%.…”
Section: Biochemical Methane Potential Assaysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Another interesting inoculum, associated with municipal waste treatment, is landfill that intrinsically possesses methanogenic activity. Landfill leachate has been used with satisfactory results; its alkaline nature can alleviate organic acid accumulation during digestion . However, start‐up time and CH 4 production rate from landfill leachate were inferior when compared to wastewater sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chicken manure, Corn stover [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Li et al [14] Wastewater treatment plant, slaughterhouse lagoon, municipal solid waste, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket Animal by products 17 Pozdniakova et al [15] Wastewater treatment plant, biogas plant Food waste, wastewater 12-74 Elbeshbishy et al [16] Biogas plants Pig manure, para grass 2-128 Dechrugsa et al [17] Digestate one adapted to turkey manure, one without adaption Turkey manure 1-8 Chamy and Ramos [18] Wastewater treatment plant, biogas plant, biowaste plant…”
Section: Substrate CV % Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported the existence of three characteristic zones during cumulative methane production process as a result of different biomasses anaerobic digestion [24]. A lag zone corresponding to the period before gas generation started can be noticed at the beginning of the digestion process.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%