Anaerobic digestion of aqueous product of co-hydrothermal liquefaction of beverage waste and sewage sludge: Reduction of toxicity and energy assessment

Adedeji, Oluwayinka M.; Bauer, Sarah K.; Jahan, Kauser

doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117228

Cited by 13 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Combining protein-rich into carbohydrate-rich feedstocks makes it possible to adjust the final pH of the process water after hydrothermal treatment (Gai et al 2015 ). For example, Adedeji et al ( 2023 ) successfully amended process water for AD treatment by adjusting the hydrothermal feedstock mixture. Also, dilution before AD treatment can be an effective post-hoc intervention for low-pH and high-TAN process waters.…”

Section: Approaches To Improve Ad Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches

Zhou,

Taiwo,

Wang

et al. 2024

Bioresour. Bioprocess.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary. Graphical Abstract

show abstract

Section: Approaches To Improve Ad Performancementioning

confidence: 99%