2016
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/36/1/012017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic digestion of wastewater screenings for resource recovery and waste reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the fat content in the samples presented values reaching up to 30% of the total dry content, with great variation between the samples collected even from the same treatment plant. Similar values of volatile solids content have been reported in the literature ranging from 77 up to 95% of dry solids, depending on the screen size and the wastewater origin, with raw samples exhibiting considerably great variations in the moisture and the total solids content [11,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the fat content in the samples presented values reaching up to 30% of the total dry content, with great variation between the samples collected even from the same treatment plant. Similar values of volatile solids content have been reported in the literature ranging from 77 up to 95% of dry solids, depending on the screen size and the wastewater origin, with raw samples exhibiting considerably great variations in the moisture and the total solids content [11,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Additional effects on digestate quality should be encountered, as soon as the feasibility of the process will be justified through the estimation of BMP potential. Nevertheless, a study has been reported on the quality of digestate from anaerobically treated screenings which was similar to the corresponding one from sewage sludge, towards its valorization through phosphorous recovery [17]. The overall estimation of potential economic and energy revenues due to the introduction of these side streams in existing treatment plants requires an integrated assessment of all potential benefits expected, including energy earnings from their utilization, reduction of landfilling costs, environmental costs revenues associated with fewer total GHG emissions, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anaerobic biodegradability tests were performed in the fine solids obtained from a 6 mm fine screen, revealing a two-stage hydrolysis process attributed to the complex nature of the screenings, and resulting in about 550 mL/g VS of methane release, corresponding to 52% of the average anaerobic degradability of the samples [8]. The methane yield of the screenings from an urban wastewater treatment plant were measured in another study, and reached 355 mL/g VS [14], while the biogas production from screening degradation in a pilot-scale study exceeded 600 mL/g VS, supporting the feasibility of co-digestion as an alternative treatment method for the valorization of screenings [28]. It should be acknowledged that the methane production measured by this work, as well as that reported by studies in the literature, revealed values well above the potential of other substrates of industrial or agricultural origin that could be used in sewage sludge co-digestion, with the maximum methane not exceeding 200 mL/g VS [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, few studies have been reported on the energy valorization of fine screenings, and they have mainly focused on the examination of the anaerobic digestion potential of solids from 6 mm screens or FOG [7], while studies investigating the combination of solid fractions with biodegradation are even more limited [13,14], without particular efforts towards identifying the relationship between the particle size fraction and the energy content [15]. The determination of the solid fraction with the maximum biogas production potential would enhance the decision towards the selection and installation of fine mesh screens with an optimal mesh size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%