2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for biogas production from concentrated sewage produced during sewer mining

Abstract: A laboratory scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor was operated for 11 months treating synthetic wastewater that mimicked the concentrate from a forward osmosis process treating municipal wastewater with 80% water recovery. The effect of temperature variation on reactor performance was assessed. The reactor operated during 4 months at 34°C and then temperature was decreased to 23°C, 17°C and 15°C mimicking the typical temperature seasonal variations of the sewage. Average COD removal efficiencies were 95, 87, 76… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waterfront takes time to travel between two electrodes, and this time taken is termed CST. The permeate flux J (LMH) was determined by using equation (2): J=ΔVA×Δt,where ΔV is change in water volume, A is an effective area of membrane, and Δtis the time interval for permeate collection (Ferrari et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Waterfront takes time to travel between two electrodes, and this time taken is termed CST. The permeate flux J (LMH) was determined by using equation (2): J=ΔVA×Δt,where ΔV is change in water volume, A is an effective area of membrane, and Δtis the time interval for permeate collection (Ferrari et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ΔV is change in water volume, A is an effective area of membrane, and Δt is the time interval for permeate collection (Ferrari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the efficiency of MBR is limited by the low-strength property of wastewater. Therefore, the application of FO as the pre-concentration process can concentrate the wastewater and consequently improve the efficiency of MBR processes [ 80 ].…”
Section: The Integration Of Fo With Other Membrane Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulated salt can reduce the osmotic pressure differences across the membrane as well as increase the density and viscosity of wastewater, consequently resulting in lower water flux of the FO process [ 93 , 94 ]. It also aggravates membrane fouling and damages the condition of activated sludge for microorganisms [ 80 , 90 , 94 ]. In order to mitigate the salt accumulation in OMBR systems, several strategies were proposed in current studies, including the selection of suitable draw solution with lower reserve salt flux [ 29 ], the fabrication of high-performance FO membranes [ 95 ], and the combination of MF/UF technologies with OMBR [ 96 ].…”
Section: Integration Of Fo With Other Wastewater Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased methane production potential and COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal efficiency using anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for sewer mining may be studied to optimize the environmental performance of sustainable community-based systems [50], however, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) technology may have a better environmental performance, due to the associated environmental impacts of AnMBR membrane fouling [51]. Various other technologies based on circular economy thinking may be modelled to further improve the environmental performance of sanitation options, such as nutrient recovery [52,53], biogas production from urban organic waste [54,55] and blackwater [17,[56][57][58], and water reuse from source-diverted greywater [59].…”
Section: Other Resource Recovery and Future Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%