Anaerobic Mesophilic Codigestion of Rice Straw and Chicken Manure: Effects of Organic Loading Rate on Process Stability and Performance

Mei, Zili; Liu, Xiaofeng; Huang, Xin; Dong, Li; Yan, Zhiying; Yuan, Y.; Huang, Yajun

doi:10.1007/s12010-016-2035-6

Cited by 32 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, as was reported previously, the VFAs increase along with the accumulation of TAN, which causes serious inhibition in AD systems [5,26]. However, in Stage 5 of this experiment, the VFAs reached a highest value of 1412 mg/L, which was much lower than the threshold value (2500 mg/L) of the inhibition reported previously [27]. The levels of some of the VFAs did not keep increasing; in other words, they declined during a certain period, like iso-butyric acid (declined from Day 120 to Day 140).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 52%

Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates

Zhang

Wang

Pei

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poultry manure is the main source of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution, and its effective disposal through anaerobic digestion (AD) is of great significance; meanwhile, the high nitrogen content of chicken manure makes it a typical feedstock for anaerobic digestion. The performance of chicken-manure-based AD at gradient organic loading rates (OLRs) in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) was investigated herein. The whole AD process was divided into five stages according to different OLRs, and it lasted for 150 days. The results showed that the biogas yield increased with increasing OLR, which was based on the volatile solids (VS), before reaching up to 11.5 g VS/(L·d), while the methane content was kept relatively stable and maintained at approximately 60%. However, when the VS was further increased to 11.5 g VS/(L·d), the total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), pH, and alkalinity (CaCO3) rose to 2560 mg·L−1, 8.2, and 15,000 mg·L−1, respectively, while the volumetric biogas production rate (VBPR), methane content, and VS removal efficiency decreased to 0.30 L·(L·d)−1, 45%, and 40%, respectively. Therefore, the AD performance immediately deteriorated and ammonia inhibition occurred. Further analysis demonstrated that the microbial biomass yield and concentrations dropped dramatically in this period. These results indicated that the AD stayed steady when the OLR was lower than 11.5 g VS/(L·d); this also provides valuable information for improving the efficiency and stability of AD of a nitrogen-rich substrate.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 52%

Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates

Zhang

Wang

Pei

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similarly, co-digestion of RS with various co-substrates such as cow manure (CoM), PM, CM, paper mill sludge (PMS), piggery wastewater (PWW), and municipal sewage sludge (MSS) has been reported by other researchers. The results of these studies (Table 5) show the enhancement in energy recovery from the co-digestion of RS compared to its mono-digestion [22,28,41,67,68]. Co-digestion of RS can be realized with several different co-substrates as the results of the above-mentioned studies illustrate.…”

Section: Co-digestion Of Rsmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Similarly, the effect of various OLRs on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of RS with the PM [41], CoM [28], and CM [67] have been investigated, and at 6−8, 6, and 4.8 g VS L −1 d −1 , there was no inhibition in the digesters due to the accumulation of VFAs or ammonia, respectively. However, co-digestion of RS with PM and CoM was severely inhibited by VFAs at OLR of 12 g VS L −1 d −1 .…”

Section: Organic Loading Rate (Olr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review on the Fate of Nutrients and Enhancement of Energy Recovery from Rice Straw through Anaerobic Digestion

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open field burning and tilling the rice straw (RS) back into the fields causes environmental threats by contributing to the increased greenhouse gas emissions. Energy and nutrient recovery from RS through anaerobic digestion (AD) is an effective solution for its utilization. Although RS has good methane potential, its characteristics make it a difficult substrate for AD. This paper reviews the characteristics of RS, mass balance, and distribution of nutrients into liquid and solid digestate in the AD. The present review also discusses the effect of temperature, co-digestion, mixing, inoculum, organic loading rate, recycling liquid digestate, the addition of trace elements, and their bioavailability on the enhancement of biogas/methane yield in the AD of RS. In addition, the digestion of RS at various scales is also covered in the review.

show abstract

“…Anaerobic degradation of simple sugar may result in VFA formation and accumulation, leading to a pH decrease and methanogenesis inhibition [75]. Mixing them with low organic content substrates [124,170] might balance operational conditions and biogas production [171].…”

Section: Anaerobic Mono-digestion Of Fwmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reviewing the Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste: From Waste Generation and Anaerobic Process to Its Perspectives

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Discharge of waste in general, and food waste, in particular, is considered one of the major environmental problems today, as waste generation increases continuously, reaching values of 32% of all food produced worldwide. There are many different options that can be applied to the management and evaluation of waste treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion seems to be one of the most suitable solutions because of its benefits, including renewable energy generation in form of biogas. Moreover, if FW (food waste) is digested in anaerobic digesters from Waste Water Treatment Plants, a common solution is provided for both residues. Furthermore, co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge provides benefits in terms of anaerobic process stability enhancing the buffer capacity of ammonia (for example) and biogas formation, which can be increased up to 80% when compared with monodigestion. The present paper reviews food waste anaerobic digestion from its generation, characteristics and different options for its management, and it does focus specifically on the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process, stages, limiting rates and parameters, utilizing numerous experiences, strictly related to food waste. Pre-treatments are also considered as they are important and innovative for enhancing biogas production and its methane yield. The paper shows an extensive collection of pre-treatments, its basics, improving factors, and numerical data of biogas formation improvements that are related both to substrate modification and to the synergistic effect of co-digestion, which could lead to an increase of methane production from 11% to 180%.

show abstract

Anaerobic Mesophilic Codigestion of Rice Straw and Chicken Manure: Effects of Organic Loading Rate on Process Stability and Performance

Cited by 32 publications

References 36 publications

Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates

Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates

A Review on the Fate of Nutrients and Enhancement of Energy Recovery from Rice Straw through Anaerobic Digestion

Reviewing the Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste: From Waste Generation and Anaerobic Process to Its Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About