2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2016-0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobically Digested Dairy Manure as an Alternative Nitrogen Source to Mitigate Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Fall-Fertilized Corn

Abstract: Anaerobically digested dairy manure (AD) has been proposed as an alternative nitrogen source to reduce soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions compared with raw dairy manure (RM). The aim of this research was to compare soil N 2 O emissions associated with AD and RM according to three application methods: surface broadcasting (SB), incorporation (SBI), and injection (INJ). The field experiment was conducted on a loam soil at Elora, ON, from November 2012 to November 2014, using a randomized block design with four… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2010 and 2011, the separated solids and cattle manure were surface applied and incorporated with an offset disc (about 2 to 10 cm depth). The incorporation methods were selected as representative of best management practices aimed at minimizing N losses (Webb et al, 2013; Cambareri et al, 2017). Nevertheless, differences in how the separated solids and cattle manure were applied compared with the digestate likely contributed to the year‐to‐year variability observed for these treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2010 and 2011, the separated solids and cattle manure were surface applied and incorporated with an offset disc (about 2 to 10 cm depth). The incorporation methods were selected as representative of best management practices aimed at minimizing N losses (Webb et al, 2013; Cambareri et al, 2017). Nevertheless, differences in how the separated solids and cattle manure were applied compared with the digestate likely contributed to the year‐to‐year variability observed for these treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G lobally , there is limited information about how biogas residues influence nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions after they are applied to soil (Charles et al, 2017) and even less information for rainfed semiarid areas (Meijide et al, 2009; Aguilera et al, 2013). In Canada, most research on N 2 O emissions from agricultural soils amended with biogas residues has been conducted in eastern Canada (Chantigny et al, 2007; Schwager et al, 2016; Cambareri et al, 2017). Little or no data are available for the much drier semiarid climates of western Canada.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas samples were collected using static enclosed chambers. The sampling chamber consisted of two units (a collar and lid): (a) the collar, a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) open cylinder (inner diameter = 44.2 cm, outer diameter = 45.7 cm, and height = 19 cm) which was inserted between corn rows to a depth of 10 cm at each sampling location; (b) a PVC lid with 8.3 cm height, covered with round PVC sheet (1.27 cm thick) fixed into positions using PVC cement [60]. The lids were covered with insulating double-layered reflective bubble wrap.…”
Section: Gas and Soil Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chamber lid had tubing outlets connected to an internal four-port manifold, made of polypropylene union tees and four tubes (15 cm long by 0.15 cm internal diameter) (Chemfluor FEP, Cole-Parmer) to collect the samples from four points within the headspace ensuring a representative sample. A 10 cm long and 0.48 cm inner diameter vent tube was connected to the lid to compensate for inner and outer air pressure [60]. For each measurement, four gas samples were taken from the chamber using a 20 mL non-sterile syringe at 10 min intervals (0, 10, 20, and 30 min after closure) [61].…”
Section: Gas and Soil Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project took place at a commercial dairy farm before and after the installation of a biogas system, from 2010 to 2015. Greenhouse gas emissions from the main dairy barn were reported in Ngwabie, Vanderzaag, Jayasundara, and Wagner‐Riddle (2014), and those associated with dairy manure–digestate applications to soils are described in Cambareri, Drury, Lauzon, Salas, and Wagner‐Riddle (2017) and Cambareri, Wagner‐Riddle, Drury, Lauzon, & Salas (2017). Emissions of CH 4 from untreated dairy manure storage during August 2010 to November 2011 were reported in Kariyapperuma et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%