2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analgesia through the looking‐glass? A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a ‘virtual’ limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement

Abstract: The extent to which viewing a 'virtual' limb, the mirror image of an intact limb, modifies the experience of a phantom limb, was investigated in 80 lower limb amputees before, during and after repeated attempts to simultaneously move both intact and phantom legs. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, a control condition in which they only viewed the movements of their intact limb and a mirror condition in which they additionally viewed the movements of a 'virtual' limb. Although the mirror … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
148
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
148
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to their heterogeneity it is difficult to ascertain who with PLP would benefit most from MT, and how the MT should be delivered. These studies suggest that perhaps MT is not protocol, intensity, frequency or subject dependant as the pain alleviation identified was found using various protocols amongst heterogeneous groups, perhaps what is more important is the ability to produce PLM or gain a sense of control/ownership whilst using MT, as this coincided with studies (Clerici et al, 2012;Sumatani et al, 2008;Brodie et al, 2007;Mosely., 2006) which reported PLP alleviation. The MT group of Brodie et al (2007) were twice as effective as the control MV group at creating PLM and gained more PLA than controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, due to their heterogeneity it is difficult to ascertain who with PLP would benefit most from MT, and how the MT should be delivered. These studies suggest that perhaps MT is not protocol, intensity, frequency or subject dependant as the pain alleviation identified was found using various protocols amongst heterogeneous groups, perhaps what is more important is the ability to produce PLM or gain a sense of control/ownership whilst using MT, as this coincided with studies (Clerici et al, 2012;Sumatani et al, 2008;Brodie et al, 2007;Mosely., 2006) which reported PLP alleviation. The MT group of Brodie et al (2007) were twice as effective as the control MV group at creating PLM and gained more PLA than controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…PLM and subsequent PLP alleviation was experienced by patients with vivid as well as sparse MV abilities (Brodie et al, 2003). And after a single treatment of MV the control group of Brodie et al (2007) had significant PLP alleviation. Although it is thought that MV only partially activates the same cortical pathways as MT, therefore we should not expect MV to be as effective as actual visual feedback (Ramachandran & Altschular., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2007, two smaller randomized controlled trials were published that attempted to address this deficiency. One study looked at the effects of mirror therapy on phantom limb motion, phantom limb sensation, and PLP [18]. In this study, no differences were seen between the mirror therapy arm and the control arm.…”
Section: Mirror Therapymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[1][2][3][4] PLP is one of the main causes of disability and distress among amputees, [5] and incidence of this phenomenon is up to 80 percent. [4,[6][7][8][9] Individual physiological, environmental, and psychological factors are involved in the etiology of PLP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%