2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40360-015-0016-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analgesic use in a Norwegian general population: change over time and high-risk use - The Tromsø Study

Abstract: BackgroundIncreased use of analgesics in the population is a cause for concern in terms of drug safety. There is a paucity of population-based studies monitoring the change in use over time of both non-prescription (OTC) analgesics and prescription (Rx) analgesics. Although much is known about the risks associated with analgesic use, we are lacking knowledge on high-risk use at a population level. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of non-prescription and prescription analgesic use, chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[17] Most of the analgesics user in this study are taking one tablet mostly for minor pains such as fever and headache which shows lack of information about appropriate adult dose which agrees with a Norwegian study which says that their respondents were using a lower dose of OTC drugs and had not exceeded the maximum dose. [18,19] We also encountered most participates who were convinced that NSAIDs and paracetamol have no side effects. Similar observations come from Poland study and papers of Matoulková et al and Reguła et al, where similarly around 16% of the subjects shared the same belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Most of the analgesics user in this study are taking one tablet mostly for minor pains such as fever and headache which shows lack of information about appropriate adult dose which agrees with a Norwegian study which says that their respondents were using a lower dose of OTC drugs and had not exceeded the maximum dose. [18,19] We also encountered most participates who were convinced that NSAIDs and paracetamol have no side effects. Similar observations come from Poland study and papers of Matoulková et al and Reguła et al, where similarly around 16% of the subjects shared the same belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were also prone to unhealthy eating: fast food was consumed on average 2.5 times per week, which could be considered regular consumption (Anderson et al 2011;Odegaard et al 2012). Alcohol consumption seemed to be infrequent (about once a week), while painkiller use amounted to once a week on average (in Turkey amounting to twice a week), which could be considered frequent use (Dale et al 2015;Samuelsen et al 2015).…”
Section: Frequencies Of Health Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Atypical/adjuvant analgesics were only included in supplementary analyses due to equivocal indications for use (Supplement). Furthermore, participants reported use of OTC analgesics last 4 weeks [1].…”
Section: Definition Of Persistent Analgesic Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term effectiveness/efficacy of analgesics remains for the most part unproven [6][7][8]. Adverse effects are on the other hand well known and are particularly associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids [1,9,10]. Persistent use of analgesics has substantial economic costs, both for the individual and the society, e.g., through reimbursement or the management of adverse effects [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation