2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analgesics for the management of acute dental pain in the pediatric population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We collected information on the sum of pain relief scores at each observational time point (for example, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours … 6 hours), which is the total pain relief, and the summed pain intensity difference expressed as the sum of pain intensity differences between each observational time point (for example, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours … 6 hours) and baseline. 6 Once the panel defined patients’ features, clinical conditions, interventions under comparison, and outcomes of interest, we implemented a first electronic survey via Qualtrics to gather feedback from identified stakeholder organizations ( eBox , available online at the end of this article). We asked stakeholders to evaluate the completeness and relevance of each clinical question addressed in the guideline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We collected information on the sum of pain relief scores at each observational time point (for example, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours … 6 hours), which is the total pain relief, and the summed pain intensity difference expressed as the sum of pain intensity differences between each observational time point (for example, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours … 6 hours) and baseline. 6 Once the panel defined patients’ features, clinical conditions, interventions under comparison, and outcomes of interest, we implemented a first electronic survey via Qualtrics to gather feedback from identified stakeholder organizations ( eBox , available online at the end of this article). We asked stakeholders to evaluate the completeness and relevance of each clinical question addressed in the guideline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete report of the systematic review informing this guideline is available elsewhere. 6 Briefly, we searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos database, and the gray literature from database inception through September 2021 and conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized controlled trials [RCTs] 13 ) independently and in duplicate. We created GRADE summary-of-findings tables to display the effect of the interventions in relative and absolute estimates, number of studies and participants, and certainty of the evidence per outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation