2019
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182018193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise do reconhecimento populacional das figuras do sentence production program for aphasia

Abstract: RESUMO Objetivo Analisar o reconhecimento das figuras e a familiaridade dos contextos do Sentence Production Program for Aphasia (SPPA), para obter dados sobre a possibilidade de uso para a língua portuguesa e/ou da necessidade de sua adaptação. Método Inicialmente, foi realizada a tradução dos estímulos por falantes do inglês e, em seguida, a retrotradução para ajustes sem a alteração das estruturas sintáticas das frases. O material foi então submetido para a análise de 39 indivíduos adultos de alta escol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as they were developed in a different culture, it could be hypothesized that the cultural adaptations would not be enough for them to be equally understood and/or retold by healthy speakers. In fact, transcultural adaptations are not easy, even with stimulus that are less complex than stories [21,22]. An initial comparison between them shows that some plots naturally seem more familiar than others such as those for the Water and Baseball stories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as they were developed in a different culture, it could be hypothesized that the cultural adaptations would not be enough for them to be equally understood and/or retold by healthy speakers. In fact, transcultural adaptations are not easy, even with stimulus that are less complex than stories [21,22]. An initial comparison between them shows that some plots naturally seem more familiar than others such as those for the Water and Baseball stories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%