Análise produtiva e econômica de suínos criados nos sistemas wean-to-finish e convencional de produção

Consoni, Wagner; Cristani, José; Klaumann, Francini; Arruda, Paula Maciel; Zimmermann, Anelise; Lorenzetti, Robson Guilherme; Dacoregio, T.M.; Neto, André Thaler; Traverso, Sandra Davi

doi:10.1590/1678-4162-8036

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The perception of profit in WTF and finishing farms based on the data of this study is different from the observed in another study (Piva and Gonçalves, 2014), which indicated that the WTF systems in Brazil require more investments in infrastructure and manpower training and, therefore, have the lowest profitability on a short or average term. A study of Consoni et al (2015) indicated that the WTF system have a good economic viability in the Brazilian perspective, mostly due to the increase in average daily weight gain and average weight at slaughter, in comparison with pigs raised in the traditional growing and finishing systems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socioeconomic and investment profile of environment control in a swine integration system

Beker¹,

França²,

Tomas³

et al. 2022

Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal production systems and agribusinessFull-length research article Socioeconomic and investment profile of environment control in a swine integration system ABSTRACT -The objective of this study was to characterize and understand the investment profile towards technologies for control and automation of climate control on swine farms, focused on integrated producers on the same integration system. A structured questionnaire including open, dichotomic, or multiple-choice questions was responded by 190 integrated producers classified as nursery (28,300 swines), wean-to-finish (WTF; 144,388 swines), or finishing unit (FU; 164,185 swines) farms. Data were described and categorized according to the type of integrated producer (nursery, WTF, and FU) and income history during a 24-month interval. The most predominant farmer profile was of a 44.5-year-old man, with incomplete secondary education. Furthermore, the majority of the farms had family-based labor with an average area of 43.6±65.5 ha and ~2.4 economic activities developed. Overall, a reduced labor availability was observed, although the integrated producers declared to be satisfied with the activities. Interestingly, integrated producers with a better income history declared a longer working (high = 37; average = 31; regular = 31; low = 28 min). The investment profile in automation technologies is conservative; however, potential improvements in pig performance were the most popular justification for potential investments. Furthermore, high costs, knowledge in technologies, interest rates, and quality of the available material are the limiting factors for investing in environment control. A total of 74% of the integrated producers considered the activity as economically profitable. Lastly, the uptake of environmental control technologies is strongly associated with the average income received by farmers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socioeconomic and investment profile of environment control in a swine integration system

Beker¹,

França²,

Tomas³

et al. 2022

Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nesse sistema, os leitões são desmamados e transferidos diretamente a um galpão WF (creche-crescimento-terminação), em que permanecem até o abate (CONSONI et al, 2015). Em média, os animais chegavam na unidade de produção vindos direto da maternidade, com 21 dias, e permaneciam até o abate, por aproximadamente 165 dias.…”

Section: Fontes De Inóculounclassified

Fruticultura Irrigada No Vale Do São Francisco: Riscos Na Produção Agrícola

Carvalho,

Araújo,

Silva

et al. 2024

Engenharia Do Futuro: Tendências E Perspectivas - Volume 5

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A fruticultura tem se destacado dentro do agronegócio quanto a sua representatividade no setor de exportação. No Nordeste, o setor agrícola de produção de frutas tem evidência no vale do São Francisco com grande produção de frutas in-natura destinadas ao mercado internacional, com destaque ao polo de Petrolina e Juazeiro. Contudo, a fruticultura ainda requer grande mão de obra para as atividades manuais, sendo possível notar diversos riscos quanto a segurança de trabalho rural nessas atividades. Diante disso, o objetivo desse trabalho foi identificar e analisar os principais riscos provenientes das atividades realizadas no polo de fruticultura de Petrolina/PE e Juazeiro/BA. Foi realizada a pesquisa descritiva e documental para a análise de dados. As informações contidas no texto foram coletadas mediante uma visita in loco no polo de fruticultura em estudo. A análise foi baseada nas normas técnicas que dispõem sobre segurança de trabalho, tais como a NR-6, NR-21, NR-7 e NR-31. Foram observados riscos físicos, químicos, biológicos, ergonômicos e de acidentes nas atividades exercidas dentro da fruticultura. Diante disso, foram indicadas medidas preventivas específicas para cada risco encontrado, a fim de minimizar os riscos encontrados, de acordo com as normas regulamentadoras que regem o trabalho rural. Dentre essas, pode-se citar o uso de EPIs adequados, medidas ergonômicas e capacitação técnica dos trabalhadores rurais quanto a medidas de segurança do trabalho rural. Além disso, sugere-se novas pesquisas relacionadas a segurança do trabalho rural, abrangendo outros tipos de produção e atividades agropecuárias.

show abstract

Análise produtiva e econômica de suínos criados nos sistemas wean-to-finish e convencional de produção

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

Socioeconomic and investment profile of environment control in a swine integration system

Socioeconomic and investment profile of environment control in a swine integration system

Fruticultura Irrigada No Vale Do São Francisco: Riscos Na Produção Agrícola

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About