Análisis bibliométrico: la terapia de espejo como estrategia de intervención desde la terapia ocupacional en el ámbito clínico

Álzate, Elvis Siprian Castro; Rojas, Karen Aguía; Murcia, Leidy Vanessa Linares; Castro, Laura Yanquén; Villanueva, Vanessa Reyes

doi:10.12804/revsalud14.01.2016.06

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of these studies analyzed the journals considered to be most representative of the subject area [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], while other authors studied a country or institution such as Brown et al [ 12 ] who analyzed the research publications by Australian authors. Other researchers explored the scientific literature on a specific subject area of occupational therapy, for example, Larsson, Haglund, and Hagberg [ 13 ] focused on geriatrics, Gutman and Raphael-Greenfield [ 14 ] focused on mental health, and Castro-Alzate et al [ 15 ] focused on mirror therapy. However, so far, fewer studies have analyzed occupational therapy research from a broad perspective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolutionary Analysis of International Scientific Output in Occupational Therapy from 1917 to 2020

Espinosa-Sempere

Pérez-Jover

Quesada

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Published evidence on the progress of occupational therapy research from a broad perspective is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the international research productivity on occupational therapy from 1917 to 2020. This was a bibliometric study including articles indexed on MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL. The literature search was conducted in June 2021 using the descriptor “occupational therapy” and the term “Ergotherap*”, and was limited to citable documents. Price’s law and Bradford’s law were applied to analyze a number of bibliometric indicators. Research on occupational therapy had an average annual growth rate of 26.4% and followed an exponential model. The top producing countries were the USA (21.52%) and the UK (6.07%). There is a high transience index of 74.81%. The top producing author was Kielhofner, G. (n = 132). Studies with the highest reported scientific evidence accounted for 1.13% (n = 638) of the total number of publications. More randomized controlled trials are necessary to increase the quality of the evidence base. Moreover, a greater collaboration between authors is needed for the professionalization of this research field.

show abstract