2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.endonu.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis coste-efectividad del cribado universal de la enfermedad tiroidea en mujeres embarazadas en España

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important point in public screening is cost-effectiveness; if the usefulness of a screening model is definitively proven, women’s global screening in the first trimester appears to be cost-effective [ 76 78 ]. A study by Dosiou et al [ 79 ] demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of universal screening of pregnant women with anti-TPO Ab and TSH antibodies in the first trimester of pregnancy compared to a high-risk screening strategy. Based on sensitivity analyses, even when the benefits of screening were limited to the diagnosis and treatment of overt hypothyroidism, screening was very cost-effective at less than $8000/quality-adjusted life-year [ 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important point in public screening is cost-effectiveness; if the usefulness of a screening model is definitively proven, women’s global screening in the first trimester appears to be cost-effective [ 76 78 ]. A study by Dosiou et al [ 79 ] demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of universal screening of pregnant women with anti-TPO Ab and TSH antibodies in the first trimester of pregnancy compared to a high-risk screening strategy. Based on sensitivity analyses, even when the benefits of screening were limited to the diagnosis and treatment of overt hypothyroidism, screening was very cost-effective at less than $8000/quality-adjusted life-year [ 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, analysis for cost-effectiveness has demonstrated that for every 100,000 pregnant women screened for SCH, $8,356,383 is saved, and 589.3 QALYs (marginal cost per quality-adjusted life year) are gained (31). Another study also reported that universal screening instead of high risk screening would result in an annual saving of €2,653,854 for the Spanish National Health System (32). The findings of this study suggest that if pregnancy is planned, universal screening should ideally be performed in the preconception period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 37 In Spain, screening patients at both high and low risk for thyroid disease proved to be more cost effective compared to no screening and screening only high-risk patients. 38 Data on the subject in Saudi Arabia is lacking, and longitudinal studies on the cost-effectiveness of implementing universal screening for SCH in pregnancy in Saudi Arabia are needed to further evaluate whether universal screening in Saudi Arabia is justified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%