2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2011.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis multicéntrico de supervivencia y factores pronósticos en el carcinoma no microcítico de pulmón en estadio I patológico según la nueva clasificación TNM de 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients completed a standardized questionnaire recording their medical history, tobacco consumption, and actual treatments. Further, the TNM staging of the primary lesion 12 and the surgical procedure data were also collected. During the surgery, a sample within the resected bronchus was taken for microbiological studies prior to the resection in order to evaluate microbiological colonization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients completed a standardized questionnaire recording their medical history, tobacco consumption, and actual treatments. Further, the TNM staging of the primary lesion 12 and the surgical procedure data were also collected. During the surgery, a sample within the resected bronchus was taken for microbiological studies prior to the resection in order to evaluate microbiological colonization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the prognostic factors studied for lung cancer patients 7 are stage, performance status, 8 weight loss, gender, age, smoking, smoking history, quality of life, marital status, depression, and genetic mutations 6 9 - 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidities were evaluated using the Charlson index [15]. Furthermore, the TNM staging of the primary lesion [16] and information regarding the surgical procedure were also collected. During surgery, a portion of the lung parenchyma of approximately 1 cm 2 in area and 0.5 cm thick that was grossly normal and distant from the injury that had motivated the intervention was selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%