Análisis psicométrico de la PANAS en Brasil

Nunes, Lucas Yukio Otsuka; Lemos, Daniel Campos Lopes; Júnior, Rodolfo de Castro Ribas; Béhar, C.; Pires, Priscila

doi:10.22235/cp.v13i1.1808

Cited by 18 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, it has been shown in the previous PANAS history of applying CFAs (n = 27) that some items present a complex behavior (i.e., cross-load). This situation has been evidenced in six of the previous studies (22.22%), involving the items Alert, Excited, Strong, Nervous, Jittery, Hostile, and Active (Caicedo Cavagnis et al, 2018;Flores Kanter & Medrano, 2016;Heubeck & Boulter, 2020;Graudeau et al, 2006;Nunes et al, 2019). It is also relevant to note that in the remaining 11 studies that have used CFA (39.28%), only the fit of the two-factor model has been ascertained.…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%

“…In particular, the use of the principal component analysis estimation method has been strongly criticized as it does not respond to the general objectives and postulates of EFA (Lloret-Segura et al, 2014). However, principal axis factoring has been applied in 4 of the 19 antecedents that have applied EFA (21.05%; Huebner & Dew, 1995;Kwon et al, 2010;López-Gómez et al, 2015;Nunes et al, 2019). It is relevant to note that of the remaining EFA studies in the literature, three have applied the maximum likelihood estimation method (ML) that assumes quantitative indicators and normal distributions of scores (n = 5; 26.31%; Arancibia-Martini, 2019; Killgore, 2000;Moriondo et al, 2011;Mota de Sousa et al, 2016;Santángalo et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) is still a topic of debate. There are several reasons why using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for scale validation is advantageous and can help understand and resolve conflicting results in the factor analytic literature. ObjectiveThe main objective of the present study was to advance the knowledge regarding the factor structure underlying the PA-NAS scores by utilizing the different functionalities of the EGA method. EGA was used to (1) estimate the dimensionality of the PANAS scores, (2) establish the stability of the dimensionality estimate and of the item assignments into the dimensions, and (3) assess the impact of potential redundancies across item pairs on the dimensionality and structure of the PANAS scores. MethodThis assessment was carried out across two studies that included two large samples of participants.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, it has been shown in the previous history of applying CFA (n = 27) that some items present a complex behavior (i.e., cross-load). This situation has been evidenced in 6 of the previous studies (22.22%), involving the items Alert, Excited, Strong, Nervous, Jittery, Hostile and Active (Caicedo-Cavagnis et al, 2018;Flores-Kanter & Medrano, 2016;Heubeck & Boulter, 2020;Graudeau et al, 2006;Nunes et al, 2019). It is also relevant to note that in the remaining 11 studies that have used CFA (39.28%), just the fit of the two-factor model has been verified.…”

Section: A Modern Network Approach To Revisiting the Positive And Negative Affective Schedule (Panas) Construct Validitymentioning

confidence: 83%

“…In particular, the use of the component or principal axis estimation method has been strongly criticized since it would not respond to the general objectives and postulates of EFA (Lorret-Segura, Ferreres-Traver, Hernández-Baeza, & Tomás-Marco, 2014). The latter has been applied in twelve of the nineteen antecedents that have applied EFA (63.25%; Huebner & Dew, 1995;Kown, Kalpakjian, & Roller, 2010;Krohne, Egloff, Kohlmann, & Tausch, 1996;López-Gómez, Hervás, & Vázquez, 2015;Melvin & Molloy, 2000;Nunes, Lemos, Ribas, Behar, & Pires, 2019;Pires, Filgueiras, Ribas, & Santana, 2013;Robles & Páez, 2003;Sandín et al, 1999;Santángalo, Brandariz, Cremonte, & Conde, 2019;Terracciano, McCrae & Costa Jr., 2003;Thompson, 2007). It is relevant to note that of the remaining priors, three have applied the maximum likelihood estimation method that assumes quantitative indicators and normal distributions of scores (15.78%; Killgore, 2020;Moriondo, De Palma, Medrano, & Murillo, 2010;Mota de Sousa, Marques-Vieira, Severino, Rosado, & José, 2016).…”

Section: A Modern Network Approach To Revisiting the Positive And Negative Affective Schedule (Panas) Construct Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Modern Network Approach to Revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) Construct Validity

Flores-Kanter¹,

Garrido²,

Moretti³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affective Scale (PANAS) is still a topic of debate. There are several reasons why using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for scale validation is advantageous and can help understand and resolve conflicting results in the factor-analytic literature. The main objective of the present study was to advance the knowledge regarding the factor structure underlying the PANAS scores by utilizing the different functionalities of the EGA method. EGA was used to: (1) estimate the dimensionality of the PANAS scores, (2) establish the stability of the dimensionality estimate and of the item assignments into the dimensions, and (3) assess the impact of potential redundancies across item pairs on the dimensionality and structure of the PANAS scores. This assessment was carried out across two studies that included two large samples of participants. In sum, the results are consistent with a two-factor oblique structure.

show abstract

“…The possible answer ranges 1 to 3 (never, sometimes, often). It has shown adequate levels of consistency (internal and external) and validity (28) .…”

Section: Variables and Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mindfulness y duelo: programa MADED, mindfulness para la aceptación del dolor, las emociones y el duelo

Alonso-Llácer¹,

Martín²,

Ramos-Campos³

et al. 2020

PSIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen:Objetivo: diseñar un protocolo de intervención psicológica para el acompañamiento del dolor y las emociones en el proceso de duelo basado en la atención y la compasión. Método: se incluirán dolientes mayores de 18 años, que hayan perdido al familiar al menos hace 6 meses, que se encuentren en la fase 2 o 3 de elaboración del duelo y sin presencia de problemas de salud mental previa. Se les evaluará después de firmar el consentimiento informado, mediante: el Cuestionario de Mindfulness, el Cuestionario de Satisfacción con la Vida, el Cuestionario de Vitalidad, la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión, la Escala de Afecto Positivo y Negativo e Inventario de Duelo Complicado. Se llevarán a cabo: estadísticos descriptivos, pruebas t para muestras independientes y d de Cohen o prueba U de Mann-Whitney r de Rosenthal si no se cumplen los supuestos. Además, se llevará a cabo un ANCOVA junto a eta cuadrado parcial. Resultado: el programa MADED (Mindfulness para la aceptación del dolor y las emociones en el duelo), consta de nueve sesiones semanales. Conclusión: Las sesiones que componen el programa facilitan la elaboración saludable del proceso de duelo basándose en la integración de los principios del mindfulness. Palabras clave: Atención; dolor; compasión; adaptación psicológica; emociones.[es] Mindfulness y duelo: programa MADED, mindfulness para la aceptación del dolor, las emociones y el duelo Abstract: Objective: to design a psychological intervention protocol for the accompaniment of pain and emotions in the grieving process based on attention and compassion. Method: mourners over 18 years of age, who have lost their family member at least 6 months ago, who are in phase 2 or 3 of the grieving process and who have no previous mental health problems, will be included. Descriptive statistics, Cohen's t-test for independent samples and Rosenthal's d or Mann-Whitney r U-test will be conducted if assumptions are not met. In addition, an ANCOVA will be performed along with the partial eta square. Outcome: The MADED (Mindfulness for Acceptance of Pain and Emotions in Grief) program consists of nine weekly sessions. Conclusion: The sessions that make up the program facilitate the healthy development of the grieving process based on the integration of the principles of mindfulness.

show abstract

Análisis psicométrico de la PANAS en Brasil

Cited by 18 publications

References 25 publications

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

A Modern Network Approach to Revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) Construct Validity

Mindfulness y duelo: programa MADED, mindfulness para la aceptación del dolor, las emociones y el duelo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About