2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6657(08)70215-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analiza czułości i swoistości ogólnopolskiego „Programu przesiewowych badań słuchu u noworodków”

Abstract: Universal newborn hearing screening program permit early diagnosis and intervention in neonates and infants before 6th month of age. High rate of specificity and sensitivity characterizes the Polish Program. Low rate of specificity detected in our outpatient clinic indicates the necessity to effect and cost analysis in neonatal units. Comparison of two groups with bilateral and unilateral referral rating in screening shows that higher number of patients follow diagnostic process from the group with bilateral i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to current study findings, DPOAE had a slightly higher specificity (95.39%) than TEOAE (90.6%). Results from a polish universal newborn hearing screening programme revealed a higher DPOAE specificity rate than TEOAE, but with much lower percentages of 36.9% and 79.7% respectively (Iwanicka-Pronicka et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to current study findings, DPOAE had a slightly higher specificity (95.39%) than TEOAE (90.6%). Results from a polish universal newborn hearing screening programme revealed a higher DPOAE specificity rate than TEOAE, but with much lower percentages of 36.9% and 79.7% respectively (Iwanicka-Pronicka et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Specificity is calculated by dividing the number of true negative results by the sum total of false positive and true negative results in individuals suspected to not have the condition (Parikh et al, 2008). Various specificity rates have been reported for OAEs, with some literature indicating a higher specificity for TEOAEs (Shetty et al, 2016;Tzanakakis et al, 2016) and others indicating s higher specificity for DPOAEs (Iwanicka-Pronicka et al, 2008;Maung et al, 2016). Specificity rates have been reported to be between 79.7% and 99% for TEOAE and 37% to 95% for DPOAE (Iwanicka-Pronicka et al, 2008;Maung et al, 2016;Shetty et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation