2017
DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analogical Understanding of Divine Causality in Thomas Aquinas

Abstract: The article presents the question of understanding divine causality and its analogical character in the context of Thomas Aquinas’s teaching on Divine Providence. Analyzing Aquinas’s texts concerning the relation of God’s action towards nature and its activities it is necessary to emphasize the proper understanding of mutual relations between secondary causes and the primary cause which are not on the same level. Influenced by the reflection of M. Dodds and I Silva, the author of the article refers to Aquinas’… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this must be affirmed in the natural light of reason by means of analogical ascent (Roszak 2017). Even assuming that God reveals himself; therefore, revelation is a rational operation.…”
Section: In C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this must be affirmed in the natural light of reason by means of analogical ascent (Roszak 2017). Even assuming that God reveals himself; therefore, revelation is a rational operation.…”
Section: In C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…God is not the object of science, so it means that science does not deal with Him directly but can speak about the effects of this belief or signs of God's activity in the world (Artigas 2000). However, it does not establish causal relations between the First Cause and secondary causes (Roszak 2017;Silva 2011). These questions are not the subject of science.…”
Section: Contemporary Philosophical Contexts: Panentheism and Post-thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the action of God is not the action that would bypass natural causes -like a kind of circumvention. If that were the case, such model of Godworld relationship based on a contrastive stance would be a negation of the analogical understanding of divine causality (Ramage 2020;Roszak 2017).…”
Section: Nature As Ars and Ordomentioning
confidence: 99%