2009
DOI: 10.1039/b901455c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analogies in the teaching of chemical equilibrium: a synthesis/analysis of the literature

Abstract: This paper presents a thorough literature review of the analogies used to teach chemical equilibrium. The main objective is to compile all the analogies that have been found to be of service to the teacher and the student. Additionally, we categorize and analyze analogies in relation to the following aspects: representation of the dynamic nature of equilibrium, the equality of the rates of forward and reverse reactions, the reversibility of the reaction as the concept involved, the calculation of the equilibri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…That statement has many implications for the way science is taught since as described by Garvin‐Doxas et al “…a new concept cannot be learned until the student is forced to confront the paradoxes, inconsistencies, and limitations of the mental model that already exists in the student's mind” [25]. Different teaching strategies have been reported as a way to overcome incorrect ideas, such as the use of active learning [15, 26] or cooperative learning [27–29], the use of analogies [2, 4, 30], and the use of computer software [31–33]. However, all these teaching strategies may fall short if teachers cannot identify which incorrect ideas students bring to the course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That statement has many implications for the way science is taught since as described by Garvin‐Doxas et al “…a new concept cannot be learned until the student is forced to confront the paradoxes, inconsistencies, and limitations of the mental model that already exists in the student's mind” [25]. Different teaching strategies have been reported as a way to overcome incorrect ideas, such as the use of active learning [15, 26] or cooperative learning [27–29], the use of analogies [2, 4, 30], and the use of computer software [31–33]. However, all these teaching strategies may fall short if teachers cannot identify which incorrect ideas students bring to the course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because analogies rely on students' understanding of a ''familiar'' analog domain and students enter a classroom with different prior knowledge, analogies are not equally well understood by all students. When students do not understand analogies, analogies are ignored, misinterpreted, or become extra information to learn (Thiele and Treagust, 1992;Venville and Treagust, 1997;Raviolo and Garritz, 2009). Take, for example, a student who was asked why ATP is referred to as cellular ''currency.''…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By definition, analogies are models of reality, and as such every analog breaks down somewhere [46]. Furthermore, while analogies can be beneficial to students in understanding concepts, they can also foster alternative conceptions [47][48][49]. Piaget et al [50] argued that analogical reasoning is based on relational similarity that does not develop until early adolescence.…”
Section: Analogical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%