Analogs Supporting Design of Lunar Command, Control, Communication, and Information Architectures

Sindiy, Oleg V.; Ezra, Kristopher L.; DeLaurentis, Daniel A.; Caldwell, Barrett S.; McVittie, Thomas I.; Simpson, Kimberly A.

doi:10.2514/1.47542

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(The loss of human crew members is considered a much higher political or social cost, and not just economic cost, affecting mission planning. 18,19,20 ) However, humans demonstrate unique recovery capabilities and flexibility of strategic reorganization/reprioritization skills that still exceed all known artificial intelligence and automation systems (especially when also considering human skill at on-site physical manipulations and repair of engineering components). Suffice it to say that machine automation and human expertise represent complementary forms of system resilience and robustness.…”

Section: -Paul Valerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Meadows on the Way to Mars

Caldwell

2014

World Futures Review

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article addresses factors that will influence future human spaceflight missions. A fictional Mars expedition vignette highlights how a future Mars expedition may be tied to societal challenges and research priorities on Earth. Historical aspects of the Apollo era are used to emphasize sociotechnical factors that can influence goals, priorities, and larger societal effects of spaceflight. Current cultural and technology factors will strongly affect spaceflight in the year 2035. However, sociotechnical disruptions influence the robustness of mission planning efforts. The goal is to recognize and prepare for a range of possible futures affecting spaceflight mission scenarios.

show abstract

Section: -Paul Valerymentioning

confidence: 99%