9th Annual Workshop on Interaction Between Compilers and Computer Architectures (INTERACT'05)
DOI: 10.1109/interact.2005.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyis of Path Profiling Information Generated with Performance Monitoring Hardware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with current hardware, research applications for hardware introspection are plentiful; researchers have used HPM for profile-guided optimization [24], dynamic optimization [28], adaptive power management [29], thread scheduling for shared resources [30], path profiling [31], user-aware design [32], and others.…”
Section: Issues Facing Hpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with current hardware, research applications for hardware introspection are plentiful; researchers have used HPM for profile-guided optimization [24], dynamic optimization [28], adaptive power management [29], thread scheduling for shared resources [30], path profiling [31], user-aware design [32], and others.…”
Section: Issues Facing Hpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant amount of recent research is devoted solely to collecting unbiased edge, path, and call stack profiles [31,37,46,47], and one such paper even won the best paper award at PLDI 2009 [2]. This ostensibly simple feature should have long ago become a commodity, programmable and accessible from user space.…”
Section: A Pragmatic Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research in this clouds work of system development on with the entire facial suture; the system function provided the parameters setting, the question bank design, and online questionnaire design and material inquiry, to draw lots to draw, and made the synthesis implementation to appraise to its subject matter [10,15], such as Figure 4 establishing the questionnaire time needed comparison chart, according to the statistical result before the edition correction; it uses the system to establish 262 effective questionnaires to take the time-consuming 25747.96 seconds to be equal to 419.23 minutes is 7.15 hours, but it improves the flow to promote the system function to complement one another under the edition correction; it uses system to establish 262 effective questionnaires only to need time-consuming 1784.56 seconds to be equal to 29.74 minutes is 0.49 hour, the significance reduced for 6.66 hours. The operating time, simultaneously working efficiency significance, is promoted 16.98 times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processor hardware features for profiling [5,26,27,43] cannot completely eliminate software overhead; even hardware-accelerated profiling must somehow record profiling information, which necessarily affects the programs being profiled. In particular, external hardware tracers and debuggers [33] can profile without software overhead but require significant processor hardware support to collect and transmit traces off-chip.…”
Section: Hardware Based Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%