VTH International Congress on X-Ray Optics and Microanalysis / v. Internationaler Kongreß Für Röntgenoptik Und Mikroanalyse / V 1969
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-24778-5_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyse quantitative d’echantillons minces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, there is a significant advantage in working with small thicknesses in order to minimize the effect of FSE on k A B factors and the effect of absorption. In this context, the critical thickness, t,, necessary to prevent absorption, calculated using the Tixier &Philibert (1969) criterion andHenke &Ebisu (1974) mass absorption coefficients, is equal to 6 nm for a B-95 wtyo Fe alloy, at which about 4.7% of the X-rays would be generated by FSE. Since it would be difficult to prepare a foil thinner than 6 nm, the effect of FSE should be included in the calculation of k A B factors, and the effect of B concentration on k* at 100 keV will be significant since practical thickness values range from 50 to 100 nm.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, there is a significant advantage in working with small thicknesses in order to minimize the effect of FSE on k A B factors and the effect of absorption. In this context, the critical thickness, t,, necessary to prevent absorption, calculated using the Tixier &Philibert (1969) criterion andHenke &Ebisu (1974) mass absorption coefficients, is equal to 6 nm for a B-95 wtyo Fe alloy, at which about 4.7% of the X-rays would be generated by FSE. Since it would be difficult to prepare a foil thinner than 6 nm, the effect of FSE should be included in the calculation of k A B factors, and the effect of B concentration on k* at 100 keV will be significant since practical thickness values range from 50 to 100 nm.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the earlier work of Tixier and Philibert (1969) and Konig (1976), Goldstein et al (1977) derived an equation for the correction necessary to the k-factor when preferential absorption of x-rays takes place in a thin, parallel-sided foil:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…formulae have been derived on a Russ (1974) Powell (1976b theoretical basis. Tixier and Philibert (1969) give the equation (9) ( $ ) t r is the mass absorption coefficient for the measured x-ray line of element A in the specimen, Q is the specimen density and a is the take-off angle. On the other hand, with reference to Goldstein et al (1977) SCANNING Vol.…”
Section: Critical Specimen Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%