2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of liquid entrainment through ADS-4 in AP1000 during a typical small break LOCA transient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plenty of institutions have contributed a lot on the Design Basis Condition transients with different simulation tools such as ATHLET, RETRAN, TRAC, CATHARE, RELAP5, and TRACE for di?erent reactor types for the variations of reactor thermal hydraulic parameters. A large amount of knowledge about thermohydraulic processes in the reactor cooling systems under different operational statuses and accident conditions has been gained based on a vast number of experimental and analytical studies (Aksan, 2008;Umminger et al, 2010;Kozmenkov and Rohde, 2013;Asmolov et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2015;Bestion, 2017). The recent studies focus more on the performance of passive safety systems and the increased safety margins of newly developed reactors, as well as the code to code comparisons (Nevo et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013Hu et al, , 2014Salehi and Jahanfarnia, 2016;Yousif et al, 2017).…”
Section: Simulation Tools Used For Hpr1000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plenty of institutions have contributed a lot on the Design Basis Condition transients with different simulation tools such as ATHLET, RETRAN, TRAC, CATHARE, RELAP5, and TRACE for di?erent reactor types for the variations of reactor thermal hydraulic parameters. A large amount of knowledge about thermohydraulic processes in the reactor cooling systems under different operational statuses and accident conditions has been gained based on a vast number of experimental and analytical studies (Aksan, 2008;Umminger et al, 2010;Kozmenkov and Rohde, 2013;Asmolov et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2015;Bestion, 2017). The recent studies focus more on the performance of passive safety systems and the increased safety margins of newly developed reactors, as well as the code to code comparisons (Nevo et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013Hu et al, , 2014Salehi and Jahanfarnia, 2016;Yousif et al, 2017).…”
Section: Simulation Tools Used For Hpr1000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e typical advanced passive plant has been originated from AP600/AP1000 which adopts PCCS design [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Wang et al simulated and analyzed cold leg (CL) small-break LOCAs for AP1000 using RELAP5/MOD3.4 codes, including 2-inch, 4-inch, and 8-inch breaks, and the peak cladding temperatures during the process could meet the safety criterion [14][15][16][17]. Di Giuli et al modeled all the PCCS for the AP1000 and studied a 10-inch small-break LOCA scenario using CESAR codes; when compared to the Westinghouse-developed NOTRUMP code as reference showing a reasonable agreement [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%