1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.78.3261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses ofD+KS0K

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All other possible final-state interactions are ignored. The model yields strong-interaction phases which compare favourably with the numbers extracted (with the help of some simplifying assumptions) from the existing experimental data at D mass [12], and predicts these phases at B mass. When assessing the reliability of these predictions, one may of course question the assumption of restricting the intermediate states to those composed of two pseudoscalar mesons only.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…All other possible final-state interactions are ignored. The model yields strong-interaction phases which compare favourably with the numbers extracted (with the help of some simplifying assumptions) from the existing experimental data at D mass [12], and predicts these phases at B mass. When assessing the reliability of these predictions, one may of course question the assumption of restricting the intermediate states to those composed of two pseudoscalar mesons only.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, converting experimental measurements of D decays that include K 0 S branching ratios to those involving K 0 or K 0 is not straightforward due to the interference between the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) and Cabibbo-favored (CF) decay modes where the interference phase is unknown [5,6]. In D + s decays to K 0 K + and K 0 π + final states, the ratio of the CS decay to the corresponding CF decay may be larger than tan 2 θ C , since the tree dia-…”
Section: Deviates From the Naive Tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• [9] though one would naively expect the factorization to work reasonably well if Λ QCD /m c is really the controlling parameter of its corrections. Therefore, m b Λ QCD must be large in order for perturbative QCD to be applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%