Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. In present investigation, analyses for the damage evolution behavior of particulate composite materials by using the finite element method (FEM) and the s-version finite element method (s-FEM) were carried out. The analyses were carried out in particular interest in the phenomenon of crack propagation. Prior to crack propagation, material damage develops in the material. The material damage may be in the forms of microviod and/or microcracks in the binder (matrix) and in the form of binder (matrix)/particle separation that is known to be dewetting. In a macroscopic sense, the reinforcing particles distribute evenly in matrix. However, at microscopic level, the density of the distributed particles varies. This means that the stiffness and strength of the material also have some spatial variations. Material damages initiate at the weak material locations and then propagate the surroundings. When cracks are present in the material, the cracks interact with the surroundings and the material To simulate such scenarios, we adopted two kinds of damage constitutive models. One is isotropic damage model and the other is ?separate dilatational/deviatoric damage constitutive model? in which the contributions of hydrostatic and of deviatoric stresses are accounted for independently. A parameter in the separate dilatational/ deviatoric damage model can characterize which, hydrostatic or deviatoric stress component, has dominant influence to the damage behavior of the material. A series of analyses on uncracked and cracked specimen with statistically varying material stiffness at a microscopic level were carried out. The results revealed that the damage behavior is highly influenced by the damage mode.
SUBJECT TERMS
Fracture Mechanics