2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing demand for environmental quality: A willingness to pay/accept study in the province of Siena (Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
21
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive relationship between these two variables is generally supported by the WTP literature. For example, income and education had a positive effect on WTP in several studies (Jin et al, 2006;Basli et al, 2006;Caplan et al, 2002). However, the number of members in the house hold was unexpectedly not found to affect WTP levels significantly in our study, although it does have a positive sign, which is similar with the results of some previous studies (Othman, 2002;Jin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Estimation Results From Double Bounded Dichotomous Choicesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The positive relationship between these two variables is generally supported by the WTP literature. For example, income and education had a positive effect on WTP in several studies (Jin et al, 2006;Basli et al, 2006;Caplan et al, 2002). However, the number of members in the house hold was unexpectedly not found to affect WTP levels significantly in our study, although it does have a positive sign, which is similar with the results of some previous studies (Othman, 2002;Jin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Estimation Results From Double Bounded Dichotomous Choicesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The positive relationship between these two variables is generally supported by the WTP literature. For example, income and education had a positive effect on WTP in several studies (Jin et al, 2006;Danso et al, 2006;Basli et al, 2006;Caplan et al, 2002). However, the number of members in the household was unexpectedly not found to affect WTP levels significantly in our study, although it does have a positive sign, which is similar with the results of some previous studies (Othman, 2002;Jin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Estimation Results From Double Bounded Dichotomous Choicesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Better understanding of the problem by educated people and greater ability of occupied ones to pay may be noted as potential reasons for this result. This is consistent with other studies exploring the relationship between these two variables and WTP, where it was found that income and education levels displayed better a positive effect on WTP (Afroz et al, 2009;Basili et al, 2006;Danso et al, 2006). These findings relating to the WTP are consistent with another study where factors such as education level, per capita income, age, extent of municipal services and respondents' knowledge about scientific recycling method could affect their willingness to pay for SW services (Chakrabarti et al, 2009).…”
Section: Payments For Waste Collectionsupporting
confidence: 91%