2021
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2094/4/042035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing detection bands of two-spectral reflection method to identify forest species composition

Abstract: The optical reflection method is considered for detection of the forest areas where coniferous or broadleaved trees are dominant. Statistical modelling of correct detection and false alarm probabilities for identifying dominant (coniferous or broadleaved) tree species by the two-spectral reflection method has been conducted. It has been shown that monitoring enables us to identify dominant (coniferous or broadleaved) tree species with correct detection probability close to 1 and false alarms probability ~ seco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding their spectral transmittance, values of coniferous trees (0.02-0.41) are higher than those of broadleaf trees (0.02-0.30) in the VIS spectrum, whereas the transmittance values of coniferous trees are definitely lower than those of broadleaf trees in the NIR (conifers: 0.05-0.32; broadleaves: 0.18-0.55) and SWIR spectra (conifers: 0.01-0.21; broadleaves: 0.03-0.51). Hence, in accordance with the records in the related literature [51,66], reflectance values of 0.25 and 0.17 were assigned to coniferous trees and broadleaf trees, respectively, with corresponding transmittance values of 0.15 and 0.2. In contrast, it can be envisaged that jointly using hyperspectral and airborne LiDAR with segmented individual trees and recognized tree species, in combination with field surveys, will likely facilitate the explicit characterization of the optical properties of forest plot constituents in the future.…”
Section: Parameters Of Oursupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Regarding their spectral transmittance, values of coniferous trees (0.02-0.41) are higher than those of broadleaf trees (0.02-0.30) in the VIS spectrum, whereas the transmittance values of coniferous trees are definitely lower than those of broadleaf trees in the NIR (conifers: 0.05-0.32; broadleaves: 0.18-0.55) and SWIR spectra (conifers: 0.01-0.21; broadleaves: 0.03-0.51). Hence, in accordance with the records in the related literature [51,66], reflectance values of 0.25 and 0.17 were assigned to coniferous trees and broadleaf trees, respectively, with corresponding transmittance values of 0.15 and 0.2. In contrast, it can be envisaged that jointly using hyperspectral and airborne LiDAR with segmented individual trees and recognized tree species, in combination with field surveys, will likely facilitate the explicit characterization of the optical properties of forest plot constituents in the future.…”
Section: Parameters Of Oursupporting
confidence: 84%