2006
DOI: 10.1177/139156140500700105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing India.s Trade Dynamics vis-É-vis SAARC Members Using the Gravity Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Wooldridge (2000), random effects are possible when the cross-sectional effects are not correlated with the independent variables. Also, Nag and Nandi (2006) reported that in the gravity model context, the country effects or the intercepts will possibly have relationships with country variable such as GDP, distance, etc. In the present study, Hausmans' Specification Test was employed to choose one among the two models.…”
Section: The Gravity Model: Specification and Functional Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Wooldridge (2000), random effects are possible when the cross-sectional effects are not correlated with the independent variables. Also, Nag and Nandi (2006) reported that in the gravity model context, the country effects or the intercepts will possibly have relationships with country variable such as GDP, distance, etc. In the present study, Hausmans' Specification Test was employed to choose one among the two models.…”
Section: The Gravity Model: Specification and Functional Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher the value of GL i higher is the IIT. Following Nag and Nandi (2006), we have extended the index to measure the IIT for each of the SAARC members and adjusting it by assigning weights to individual goods, we have used equation 3to arrive at the Adjusted GL-IIT, where group denotes each of the member countries:…”
Section: Low Degree Of Intra-industry Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there are studies that have examined the impact of tariff liberalization on exports (Disdier et al, 2015; Hayakawa et al, 2020), welfare effects of regionalism vis-à-vis multilateralism (Freund, 2000; Ornelas, 2008), tectonics of regional balance of power within regionalism (Bhattacharya, 2010; Winters, 2015), GATT and WTO membership impact on trade welfare and stability (Baldwin, 2016; Larch et al, 2019; Paul, 2015; Rose, 2005), the impact of multiple RTAs involving India (Francois & Wignaraja, 2008), comparative analysis of RTAs involving ASEAN, China and India (Sen, 2006), trade creation and diversion effects of RTAs (Gaurav & Bharti, 2019; Gharleghi & Shafighi, 2020; Loganathan et al, 2021; Singh, 2021), the impact of mega-RTAs on Indian economy (Ganesh-Kumar & Chatterjee, 2016; Narayanan & Sharma, 2016), and role of India in the economic development of South-Asia (Kumar, 2020; Nag & Nandi, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%