2016
DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.12.2.p101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing, Interpreting, and Testing the Invariance of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

Abstract: Although in recent years researchers have begun to utilize dyadic data analyses such as the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM), certain limitations to the applicability of these models still exist. Given the complexity of APIMs, most researchers will often use observed scores to estimate the model's parameters, which can significantly limit and underestimate statistical results. The aim of this article is to highlight the importance of conducting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of equivalent const… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this model, it is possible to estimate the direct and indirect effects of X on Y through one or more mediator (M) when M is measured for both members of the dyad. Essentially, four different effects could be estimated [30,31]: two actor effects (i.e., one for husband and one for wife) and two partner effects (i.e., one for husband and one for wife). In this case, the indirect effects are of central importance, as they quantify and convey information about the mechanism by which X is connected to Y, and in line with this model, the mechanisms could operate through the person's own M, the partner's M, or both simultaneously.…”
Section: The Interdependence or Non-independence Of Partnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this model, it is possible to estimate the direct and indirect effects of X on Y through one or more mediator (M) when M is measured for both members of the dyad. Essentially, four different effects could be estimated [30,31]: two actor effects (i.e., one for husband and one for wife) and two partner effects (i.e., one for husband and one for wife). In this case, the indirect effects are of central importance, as they quantify and convey information about the mechanism by which X is connected to Y, and in line with this model, the mechanisms could operate through the person's own M, the partner's M, or both simultaneously.…”
Section: The Interdependence or Non-independence Of Partnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood ratio test (LRT) allows for comparison of more restricted models with less restricted models. Given that dyads were considered distinguishable (one male and one female member), standard procedures used in previous studies were followed in this analysis (Gareau et al, 2016).…”
Section: Apim Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some other DIF detection techniques were introduced which could deal with this problem and model the between groups covariance. The actor–partner interdependence models [ 39 , 40 ] and the longitudinal factor analysis based-models [ 41 ], which are tested measurement invariance over the time, are among these methods. Nonetheless, none of these methods could provide a simulation-based mechanism to evaluate statistical criteria for detecting DIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%