Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities—a case study in Sheffield

Abstract

Traditional real-time air quality monitoring instruments are expensive to install and maintain; therefore, such existing air quality monitoring networks are sparsely deployed and lack the measurement density to develop high-resolution spatiotemporal air pollutant maps. More recently, low-cost sensors have been used to collect high-resolution spatial and temporal air pollution data in real-time. In this paper, for the first time, Envirowatch E-MOTEs are employed for air quality monitoring as a case study in Sheffield. Ten E-MOTEs were deployed for a year (October 2016 to September 2017) monitoring several air pollutants (NO, NO2, CO) and meteorological parameters. Their performance was compared to each other and to a reference instrument installed nearby. E-MOTEs were able to successfully capture the temporal variability such as diurnal, weekly and annual cycles in air pollutant concentrations and demonstrated significant similarity with reference instruments. NO2 concentrations showed very strong positive correlation between various sensors. Mostly, correlation coefficients (r values) were greater than 0.92. CO from different sensors also had r values mostly greater than 0.92; however, NO showed r value less than 0.5. Furthermore, several multiple linear regression models (MLRM) and generalised additive models (GAM) were developed to calibrate the E-MOTE data and reproduce NO and NO2 concentrations measured by the reference instruments. GAMs demonstrated significantly better performance than linear models by capturing the non-linear association between the response and explanatory variables. The best GAM developed for reproducing NO2 concentrations returned values of 0.95, 3.91, 0.81, 0.005 and 0.61 for factor of two (FAC2), root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), normalised mean biased (NMB) and coefficient of efficiency (COE), respectively. The low-cost sensors offer a more affordable alternative for providing real-time high-resolution spatiotemporal air quality and meteorological parameter data with acceptable performance.

Low-Cost Environmental Sensor Networks: Recent Advances and Future Directions

“…This was unexpected given the historical reliance on passive sampling and expensive laboratory equipment for analysis in air quality studies (Snyder et al, 2013). It appears public awareness of health risks (Ali et al, 2015;van Zoest et al, 2018), and the proliferation of low-cost in situ sensors (Schneider et al, 2017;Munir et al, 2019) are driving this trend. For water systems more studies focused on quantity (n = 17) as opposed to quality (n = 11).…”

Mapping Carbon Monoxide Pollution of Residential Areas in a Polish City

“…When analyzing the scientific works [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] as well as legal provisions [14], it can be stated that there is currently incomplete information regarding the air quality when it comes to carbon monoxide, which results from a few reasons:…”

The use of personal and indoor air pollution monitors in reproductive epidemiology studies

“…Unlike more expensive monitors with comprehensive regulatory standards and processes for evaluation and certification, few standards and no certifications exist for low‐cost air pollution monitors . There is a rapidly growing body of literature (and government agency guidance) on methods to calibrate and assess the performance of low‐cost sensors that is beyond the scope of this article to review . However, at a minimum, researchers should determine whether the instruments they are considering need to be calibrated against more traditional measures of the exposure of interest (and at what frequency), whether there is information regarding the performance of the sensor in environments similar to those proposed, and whether collection of other information (eg temperature and relative humidity, filter‐based particle measures) is needed to calibrate the sensor readings, and perform colocation of all instruments at set intervals to determine whether individual units require calibration or replacement.…”

“…To try and address many of these issues, low‐cost personal air pollution monitors are becoming increasingly common and represent an emerging potential tool to enhance personal exposure assessments in research studies, as long as they can be appropriately calibrated . Many of these monitors also have the capacity to link with a person's smartphone, further enhancing data collection possibilities including GPS tracking and momentary ecological assessment.…”