2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the pH-dependent properties of proteins using pKa calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CHARMM-27 all-atom force field with CMAP correction(25) was used for the protein and ions, the TIP3P force field was used for water molecules, whereas the carbohydrate Chain Solution Force Field (CSFF) was used for the oligosaccharide tail(26). The pKa of all the charged residues was calculated using the pKaTool software(27) to determine the protonation state of the amino acids in the protein at pH 7. NAMD 2.9 software package(28) was used to run the simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHARMM-27 all-atom force field with CMAP correction(25) was used for the protein and ions, the TIP3P force field was used for water molecules, whereas the carbohydrate Chain Solution Force Field (CSFF) was used for the oligosaccharide tail(26). The pKa of all the charged residues was calculated using the pKaTool software(27) to determine the protonation state of the amino acids in the protein at pH 7. NAMD 2.9 software package(28) was used to run the simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of DpK a values are calculated equally well with both methods, but for a significant fraction there is a marked difference in the results. These cases fall into two general categories: (1) mutations where the intrinsic pK a value of the mutant is inappropriate for inducing a pK a shift in the target, and (2) mutations that interact strongly with the target residue and thus cause either a breakdown of typical Henderson-Hasselbalch titrational behavior or create a nonadditive titratable system (Nielsen 2006). Figure 3A shows the distance dependence of DpK a values for single mutations, and it is seen that a single mutation must be quite close (<13Å ) to a target residue to achieve a significant effect on the target pK a value.…”
Section: The Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such buffering effects can exist in artificially constructed systems (Nielsen 2006), but it is uncertain whether enzyme active sites display such effects. Table 1 compares the average DpK a values obtained for active site targets with those obtained for all targets, and it is clear that active site DpK a values are not buffered by their environment.…”
Section: Multiple Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E50 and E62 are in close proximity in the crystal structure (Figure S3C), and thus these observations suggest that the ionization of E50 and E62 may be coupled [46]. To determine the pK a values of E50 and E62, we used the method of global fitting of titration events (GloFTE) developed by Nielsen and co-workers [38], [47], which allows an estimate of the titration profiles for individual titratable residues (Figure 3D). The pK a fold values of all Asp and Glu determined at 298 K and 333 K are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%