2016
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2016.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the use of cognitive maps in an experiment on a group decision process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this simplified our causal maps (Markíczy and Goldberg 1995), by highlighting tie weight and node dimension from multiple use by different subjects (Cuhna and Morais 2016). Defining different clusters inside collective causal maps was instrumental to achieve a more systematic representation of the map itself (Marx and Dagan 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this simplified our causal maps (Markíczy and Goldberg 1995), by highlighting tie weight and node dimension from multiple use by different subjects (Cuhna and Morais 2016). Defining different clusters inside collective causal maps was instrumental to achieve a more systematic representation of the map itself (Marx and Dagan 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, cognitive maps use nodes to represent events, and arcs that connect these events and represent the causal relationship between them. A cognitive map can be generated with all stakeholders together, or it can be constructed from the aggregation of individual cognitive maps (Cunha & Morais, 2016).…”
Section: Problems Structuring Methods (Psm)mentioning
confidence: 99%