2015 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2015.7405538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing traffic flows through sampling: A comparative study

Abstract: Understanding network workload through the characterization of network flows, being essential for assisting network management tasks, can benefit largely from traffic sampling as long as an accurate snapshot of network behavior is captured. This paper is devoted to evaluate the real applicability of using sampling to support flow analysis. Considering both classical and emerging sampling techniques, a comparative performance study is carried out to assess the accuracy of estimating flow parameters through samp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive literature exists on sampling methods applied to traffic classification [22]. A thorough comparison is reported by [23]. As noted in [24], sampling techniques can be classified into four categories: packet, flow, smart, and selective sampling.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive literature exists on sampling methods applied to traffic classification [22]. A thorough comparison is reported by [23]. As noted in [24], sampling techniques can be classified into four categories: packet, flow, smart, and selective sampling.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the use of traffic sampling to sustain this task with reduced amount of traffic, the aspects identified in Section 5.2 for Traffic Accounting need to be taken into account once again. According to [29], [30] and Figure 10, comparing the relation between the volume of data acquired and the number of different flows identified in the network, the most suitable sampling techniques for traffic classification are time-based and multiadaptive sampling (i.e., SystT and MuST). As expected, the techniques that sample larger volumes of data, identify a larger percentage of flows.…”
Section: Traffic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. Flow identification per volume of data acquired [30], for systematic (SystC,SystT), random (RandC) and adaptive (LP, MuST) techniques.…”
Section: Traffic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results are really generic and do not target the network anomaly detection problem specifically, they thus might not apply in our situation. An extension of this study is presented in [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%