2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/7509046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation

Abstract: Based on the Bayesian principle, the modern uncertainty evaluation methods can fully integrate prior and current sample information, determine the prior distribution according to historical information, and deduce the posterior distribution by integrating prior distribution and the current sample data with the Bayesian model. As such, it is possible to evaluate uncertainty, updating in real time the uncertainty of the measuring instrument according to regular measurement, and timely reflect the latest informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After obtaining the measurement sample X = false( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , , xn false), it integrates prior information and current sample information based on the Bayes formula π false( θ | x false) l false( x | θ false) π false( θ false) to obtain θ posterior distribution, thus achieving statistical inference of θ. Where, π false( θ false) is the prior density function of θ, π false( θ | x false) is the posterior density function and l false( x | θ false) is the sample likelihood function [9, 10].…”
Section: Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining the measurement sample X = false( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , , xn false), it integrates prior information and current sample information based on the Bayes formula π false( θ | x false) l false( x | θ false) π false( θ false) to obtain θ posterior distribution, thus achieving statistical inference of θ. Where, π false( θ false) is the prior density function of θ, π false( θ | x false) is the posterior density function and l false( x | θ false) is the sample likelihood function [9, 10].…”
Section: Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (10), the posterior distribution standard uncertainty of the repeatability information of the integrated two products is:u = D [ h ( μ | x ) ] = σ 0 2 τ 2 σ 0 2 + τ 2 Considering it as a priori information, by integrating it with the follow‐up uncertainty assessment data of multiple products, the repetitive component which can fully reflect the accuracy level of the batch product inspection process can be obtained [8].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Test Uncertainty Of Precision Measurement Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the uncertainty components caused by repeatability and reproducibility of position error measurements are Formula (6) and Formula (7). Substitute Formula (14)-Formula (17) into Formula (3) and a universal model can be obtained for evaluating the uncertainty of the CMM position measurement tasks.…”
Section: Uncertainty Model For Location and Orientation Errors Measurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important parameter to characterize the quality of the measurement results, measurement uncertainty reflects the credibility of measurement results. To give scientific and proper evaluation of measurement uncertainty is an important factor to guarantee the development of modern measuring science [7,8]. CMM can complete the measurement of spatial geometric elements (including size, geometrical error parameters) more conveniently, featuring a large measurement range, high measurement efficiency and strong measurement versatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%